This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MALONEY, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by ENGH, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MALONEY, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by ENGH, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 79:1628-34 (1997)
© 1997 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Treatment of Pelvic Osteolysis Associated with a Stable Acetabular Component Inserted without Cement as Part of a Total Hip Replacement*

WILLIAM J. MALONEY, M.D.{dagger}, PAUL HERZWURM, M.D.{ddagger}, WAYNE PAPROSKY, M.D.§, HARRY E. RUBASH, M.D.# and CHARLES A. ENGH, M.D.**, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis

Thirty-five patients who had had a primary total hip replacement with a porous-coated acetabular component inserted without cement had a revision procedure to treat pelvic osteolysis. The mean age at the time of the revision operation was forty-nine years (range, twenty-nine to eighty-five years). Forty-six distinct pelvic osteolytic lesions were noted radiographically around the thirty-five cups. These lesions ranged in size from 0.5 by 0.5 centimeter to 6.3 by 2.7 centimeters (mean, 2.6 by 1.7 centimeters). Fourteen of the thirty-five patients had no or only slight occasional pain at the time of diagnosis of the pelvic osteolysis, fifteen patients had pain attributed to a loose femoral component, one had pain related to a spontaneous fracture of the greater trochanter, and one had pain related to recurrent subluxation. The remaining four patients had pain in the groin despite radiographically stable implants. All of the metal-backed porous-coated acetabular components were stable according to the preoperative radiographs, and the stability was confirmed at the time of the revision. The metal shell was left in place and the acetabular liner was exchanged in all thirty-five patients. The osteolytic lesions were debrided, and thirty-four of the forty-six lesions were filled with allograft bone chips. The patients were evaluated a minimum of two years (range, two to five years; mean, 3.3 years) after the revision operation, and all thirty-five sockets were found to be radiographically stable. The bone grafts appeared to have consolidated, and none of the osteolytic defects had progressed. One-third of the lesions were no longer visible on radiographs, regardless of whether or not they had been filled with bone graft. The remaining lesions had decreased in size. It appears that, in the short-term, exchange of the liner and débridement of the granuloma, with or without use of allograft bone chips in the osteolytic defect, is a reasonable alternative to revision of the socket provided that the metal shell is solidly fixed at the time of the revision operation. If the metal shell has been markedly damaged by the femoral head, the locking mechanism for the polyethylene liner is not intact, or a satisfactory replacement liner is not available, then revision of the porous-coated acetabular component is indicated. These results must be considered preliminary. Since osteolysis may take several years to redevelop after a revision, additional follow-up is required.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
W. Maloney and A. Rosenberg
What is the outcome of treatment for osteolysis?
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., July 1, 2008; 16(suppl_1): S26 - S32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
A. V. Lombardi Jr and K. R. Berend
Isolated Acetabular Liner Exchange
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., May 1, 2008; 16(5): 243 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. W. Howie, S. D. Neale, R. Stamenkov, M. A. McGee, D. J. Taylor, and D. M. Findlay
Progression of Acetabular Periprosthetic Osteolytic Lesions Measured with Computed Tomography
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2007; 89(8): 1818 - 1825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
D. A. Oakes and M. E. Cabanela
Impaction bone grafting for revision hip arthroplasty: biology and clinical applications.
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., October 1, 2006; 14(10): 620 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. L. Barrack and R. S. J. Burnett
Preoperative Planning for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2005; 87(12): 2800 - 2811.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
N. Kitamura, D. D.R. Naudie, S. B. Leung, R. H. Hopper Jr., and C. A. Engh Sr.
Diagnostic Features of Pelvic Osteolysis on Computed Tomography: The Importance of Communication Pathways
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2005; 87(7): 1542 - 1550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
H. G. Potter, B. J. Nestor, C. M. Sofka, S. T. Ho, L. E. Peters, and E. A. Salvati
Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Evaluation of Periprosthetic Soft Tissue
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2004; 86(9): 1947 - 1954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. E. Beaule, E. Ebramzadeh, M. LeDuff, R. Prasad, and H. C. Amstutz
Cementing a Liner into a Stable Cementless Acetabular Shell: The Double-Socket Technique
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2004; 86(5): 929 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. P. Jones and P. F. Lachiewicz
Factors Influencing the Longer-Term Survival of Uncemented Acetabular Components Used in Total Hip Revisions
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2004; 86(2): 342 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. E. Beaule, M. J. LeDuff, F. J. Dorey, and H. C. Amstutz
Fate of Cementless Acetabular Components Retained During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2003; 85(12): 2288 - 2293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. F. Bonner, R. E. Delanois, G. Harbach, M. Bushelow, and M. A. Mont
Cementation of a Polyethylene Liner into a Metal Shell : Factors Related to Mechanical Stability
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 3, 2002; 84(9): 1587 - 1593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. L. Barrack and T. P. Schmalzried
Impingement and Rim Wear Associated with Early Osteolysis After a Total Hip Replacement : A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 9, 2002; 84(7): 1218 - 1220.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
T. P. SCHMALZRIED and J. J. CALLAGHAN
Current Concepts Review - Wear in Total Hip and Knee Replacements
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 1999; 81(1): 115 - 136.
[Full Text]