This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HIRAKAWA, K.
Right arrow Articles by SECIC, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HIRAKAWA, K.
Right arrow Articles by SECIC, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 78:1235-43 (1996)
© 1996 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Characterization and Comparison of Wear Debris from Failed Total Hip Implants of Different Types*

KAZUO HIRAKAWA, M.D., PH.D.{dagger}, THOMAS W. BAUER, M.D., PH.D.{dagger}, BERNARD N. STULBERG, M.D.{ddagger}, ALAN H. WILDE, M.D.{ddagger} and MICHELLE SECIC, M.S.{dagger}, CLEVELAND, OHIO

Investigation performed at the Departments of Anatomic Pathology and Orthopaedic Surgery, and Biostatistics and Epidemiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and The Cleveland Center for Joint Reconstruction, Cleveland

Particles of wear debris have been associated with loosening of implants and with osteolysis, but few studies have examined the relationship between characteristics of the implant and clinical variables and the concentration of particles isolated from periarticular tissues. We isolated and quantified particles of wear debris from orthopaedic implants in 123 tissue samples that had been obtained adjacent to a failed total hip prosthesis from eighty-eight patients. The concentration of these particles in the tissue and the size of the particles were then analyzed in relation to patient and implant-related variables. The number of particles ranged from 8.5 x 108 to 5.7 x 1011 per gram of tissue (dry weight). More particles were found adjacent to failed titanium-alloy stems that had a cobalt-chromium-alloy modular head and failed titanium-alloy-backed cups than were found adjacent to all-cobalt-chromium-alloy prostheses. In addition, fewer particles were found adjacent to implants with a twenty-eight-millimeter femoral head than were found adjacent to implants with other femoral head sizes. Univariate analysis also showed correlations between a high concentration of particles and fixation without cement, an implant that had been in situ for a long duration, a young patient age, and an initial clinical diagnosis of avascular necrosis. Biopsy specimens from the proximal femoral membranes had higher concentrations than those from the joint capsules or the acetabular membranes. Although only five specimens were obtained directly from osteolytic lesions, the concentration of particles in those specimens was higher than that in biopsy specimens from other sites. Although many univariate correlations were identified, stepwise correlation regression analysis showed that the composition of the implant and the size of the modular femoral head were most strongly related to the concentration of debris in tissue. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study show that most failed hip implants are associated with billions of debris particles and that the concentration of these particles in tissue is related to several factors that are thought to be associated with the extent of implant wear. There are probably many factors that influence the production of orthopaedic wear debris. Some are related to the design of the implant. Others, such as the level of activity, are related to the patient. Of the variables tested in this study, the composition of the implant and the size of the modular head appeared to be most closely linked with the production of particles. Our results do not necessarily reflect the extent of debris production by stable implants, but they suggest that the metallic composition of the femoral stem, the acetabular cup, and the modular head may have an important influence on the amount of wear debris.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Biomater ApplHome page
M. Visentin, S. Stea, S. Squarzoni, M. Reggiani, C. Fagnano, B. Antonietti, and A. Toni
Isolation and Characterization of Wear Debris Generated in Patients Wearing Polyethylene Hylamer Inserts, Gamma Irradiated in Air
J Biomater Appl, October 1, 2005; 20(2): 103 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
F.H.R. De Man, W. Tigchelaar, R.K. Marti, C.J.F. Van Noorden, and H.M. Van der Vis
Effects of Mechanical Compression of a Fibrous Tissue Interface on Bone with or without High-Density Polyethylene Particles in a Rabbit Model of Prosthetic Loosening
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2005; 87(7): 1522 - 1533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
B. K. VAUGHN, T. B. DAMERON, T. W. BAUER, Y. MOCHIDA, T. AKISUE, and R. W. EBERLE
Early Osteolysis Following Total Hip Arthroplasty with Use of a Hylamer Liner in Combination with a Modular Ceramic Femoral Head. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1999; 81(10): 1446 - 9.
[Full Text]