This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by URBAN, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by GALANTE, J. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by URBAN, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by GALANTE, J. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 78:1068-81 (1996)
© 1996 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

The Bone-Implant Interface of Femoral Stems with Non-Circumferential Porous Coating. A Study of Specimens Retrieved at Autopsy*

ROBERT M. URBAN, {dagger}, JOSHUA J. JACOBS, M.D.{ddagger}, DALE R. SUMNER, PH.D.{ddagger}, CHRISTOPHER L. PETERS, M.D.{ddagger}, FRANK R. VOSS, M.D.{ddagger} and JORGE O. GALANTE, M.D., D.SC.{ddagger}, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush Arthritis and Orthopedics Institute, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago.

A histological study was performed of the bone-implant interface of fifteen titanium-alloy femoral stems with porous coating limited to three proximal areas that did not cover the full circumference of the device. The specimens were obtained at autopsy from ten cadavera at a mean of forty-six months (range, one to eighty-nine months) after the implant had been inserted without acrylic cement. The volume fraction of bone within the porous spaces (the percentage of the porous space that was filled with bone) and the extent of bone ingrowth (the percentage of the porous-coated surface covered with ingrown bone that was more than one-half fiber-diameter deep, as measured from the outer surface of the porous coating), were determined with histomorphometric methods. Eleven of the fifteen stems had bone within the porous coating that was in continuity with the surrounding medullary bone. The mean volume fraction of bone ingrowth in these specimens was 26.9 per cent (range, 12.2 to 61.0 per cent), and the mean extent of bone ingrowth was 64.3 per cent (range, 28.6 to 95.2 per cent). Both of these parameters increased with time. In the other four stems, the bone lacked continuity with the surrounding trabecular bed. Two of these stems had a limited amount of bone within the porous coating, and two stems (from one patient) had no bone ingrowth. Periprosthetic membranes surrounded by a shell of trabecular bone covered the uncoated surfaces of the stems. The membranes of implants that had been in situ for eight months or more demonstrated polyethylene wear debris, and other particles generated at the level of the joint, within histiocytes throughout the length of the femoral stem. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings in this study are relevant to the utilization and mechanisms of failure of femoral stems inserted without cement. Bone ingrowth and the resulting stability of the implant can be achieved with porous-coated stems. However, the extent of the surface that is porous-coated must be sufficient to prevent trabecular fracture as a secondary mechanism of loosening. Interruptions in the circumferential extent of the porous surface are associated with the formation of periprosthetic membranes, which provide a pathway for migration of particulate wear and corrosion products to the distal part of the stem. A circumferential coating may retard the access of particles and thus decrease the possibility of diaphyseal osteolysis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. J. Jacobs, R. M. Urban, N. J. Hallab, A. K. Skipor, A. Fischer, and M. A. Wimmer
Metal-on-metal Bearing Surfaces
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., February 1, 2009; 17(2): 69 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. J. Archibeck, R. A. Berger, J. J. Jacobs, L. R. Quigley, S. Gitelis, A. G. Rosenberg, and J. O. Galante
Second-Generation Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty : Eight to Eleven-Year Results
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2001; 83(11): 1666 - 1673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
T. P. SCHMALZRIED and J. J. CALLAGHAN
Current Concepts Review - Wear in Total Hip and Knee Replacements
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 1999; 81(1): 115 - 136.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. F. BURT, K. L. GARVIN, E. T. OTTERBERG, and O. M. JARDON
A Femoral Component Inserted without Cement in Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Study of the Tri-Lock Component with an Average Ten-Year Duration of Follow-up
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 1998; 80(7): 952 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text]