This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LIEBERMAN, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by FINERMAN, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LIEBERMAN, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by FINERMAN, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 78:835-8 (1996)
© 1996 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Differences between Patients' and Physicians' Evaluations of Outcome after Total Hip Arthroplasty*

JAY R. LIEBERMAN, M.D.{dagger}, FREDERICK DOREY, PH.D.{dagger}, PAUL SHEKELLE, M.D., PH.D.{ddagger}, LANA SCHUMACHER, {dagger}, BERT J. THOMAS, M.D.{dagger}, DOUGLAS J. KILGUS, M.D.{dagger} and GERALD A. FINERMAN, M.D.{dagger}, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles

The purpose of this study was to compare patients' and physicians' evaluations of the results of 147 total hip arthroplasties. The patients and physicians independently evaluated pain and over-all satisfaction with the outcome of the procedure using a 10.0-centimeter visual-analog scale. They also answered a questionnaire with which they assessed general health, functional ability, and pain. The mean (and standard deviation) analog rating for pain (with 0.0 centimeters indicating no pain and 10.0 centimeters, severe pain) was 1.7 ± 2.6 centimeters as assessed by the patients and 1.1 ± 1.8 centimeters as assessed by the physicians (p < 0.001, paired t test). The mean analog rating for over-all satisfaction (with 0.0 centimeters indicating poor and 10.0 centimeters, excellent) was 8.6 ± 2.1 centimeters as assessed by the patients and 8.8 ± 1.7 centimeters as assessed by the physicians (p = 0.07, paired t test). There was a marked disparity between the patients' and the physicians' scores when the patients assigned a low score to a particular area. For the thirty patients who rated the pain as more than 4.0 centimeters, the mean analog rating was 6.8 ± 2.1 centimeters according to the patients, while it was 3.6 ± 2.7 centimeters according to the physicians (p < 0.001, linear regression). The mean analog rating for over-all satisfaction according to the nineteen patients who rated this parameter as less than 7.0 centimeters was 3.8 ± 2.0 centimeters, while the mean rating according to the physicians was 6.5 ± 2.8 centimeters (p < 0.001, linear regression). The patients' and physicians' evaluations were similar regarding the results of the total hip arthroplasty when the patients had little or no pain and were satisfied with the result. However, the disparity increased as the patients' ratings for pain increased and their ratings for over-all satisfaction decreased. This study highlights a discrepancy between patients' and physicians' evaluations of the results of total hip arthroplasty. This discrepancy increased when the patient was not satisfied with the outcome. The use of patients' self-administered questionnaires as well as traditional physician-generated assessments may provide a more complete evaluation of the results of total hip arthroplasty.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
L. Sampietro-Colom, M. Espallargues, E. Rodriguez, M. Comas, J. Alonso, X. Castells, and J.L. Pinto
Wide Social Participation in Prioritizing Patients on Waiting Lists for Joint Replacement: A Conjoint Analysis
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 554 - 566.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
P Renstrom, A Ljungqvist, E Arendt, B Beynnon, T Fukubayashi, W Garrett, T Georgoulis, T E Hewett, R Johnson, T Krosshaug, et al.
Non-contact ACL injuries in female athletes: an International Olympic Committee current concepts statement
Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2008; 42(6): 394 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. V. O'Toole, R. C. Castillo, A. N. Pollak, E. J. MacKenzie, M. J. Bosse, and the LEAP Study Group
Determinants of Patient Satisfaction After Severe Lower-Extremity Injuries
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2008; 90(6): 1206 - 1211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
L. S. Lohmander, P. M. Englund, L. L. Dahl, and E. M. Roos
The Long-term Consequence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscus Injuries: Osteoarthritis
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2007; 35(10): 1756 - 1769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
K E Dreinhofer, P Dieppe, T Sturmer, D Grober-Gratz, M Floren, K-P Gunther, W Puhl, and H Brenner
Indications for total hip replacement: comparison of assessments of orthopaedic surgeons and referring physicians
Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2006; 65(10): 1346 - 1350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Fransen, C. Anderson, J. Douglas, S. MacMahon, B. Neal, R. Norton, M. Woodward, I. D Cameron, R. Crawford, S. K. Lo, et al.
Safety and efficacy of routine postoperative ibuprofen for pain and disability related to ectopic bone formation after hip replacement surgery (HIPAID): randomised controlled trial
BMJ, September 9, 2006; 333(7567): 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
U Lindemann, C Becker, R Muche, K Aminian, H Dejnabadi, T. Nikolaus, W Puhl, K Huch, and K E Dreinhofer
Gait analysis and WOMAC are complementary in assessing functional outcome in total hip replacement
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2006; 20(5): 413 - 420.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
G. M. Woolhead, J. L. Donovan, and P. A. Dieppe
Outcomes of total knee replacement: a qualitative study
Rheumatology, August 1, 2005; 44(8): 1032 - 1037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
B. Unver, V. Karatosun, and I. Gunal
Assessing the results of thrust plate prosthesis: a comparison of four different rating systems
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2005; 19(6): 654 - 658.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. C. Edwards II, Y. Karpitskaya, C. Cha, J. G. Heller, C. Lauryssen, S. T. Yoon, and K. D. Riew
Accurate Identification of Adverse Outcomes After Cervical Spine Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2004; 86(2): 251 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
B. Unver, V. Karatosun, I. Gunal, and S. Angin
Comparison of two different rehabilitation programmes for thrust plate prosthesis: a randomized controlled study
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2004; 18(1): 84 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J D Stein, M M Brown, G C Brown, H Hollands, and S Sharma
Quality of life with macular degeneration: perceptions of patients, clinicians, and community members
Br. J. Ophthalmol., January 1, 2003; 87(1): 8 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. A. McGee, D. W. Howie, P. Ryan, J. R. Moss, and O. T. Holubowycz
Comparison of Patient and Doctor Responses to a Total Hip Arthroplasty Clinical Evaluation Questionnaire
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 10, 2002; 84(10): 1745 - 1752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
M. Englund, E. M. Roos, H. P. Roos, and L. S. Lohmander
Patient-relevant outcomes fourteen years after meniscectomy: influence of type of meniscal tear and size of resection
Rheumatology, June 1, 2001; 40(6): 631 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
A-K Nilsdotter, Y Aurell, A-K Siosteen, L S Lohmander, and H P Roos
Radiographic stage of osteoarthritis or sex of the patient does not predict one year outcome after total hip arthroplasty
Ann Rheum Dis, March 1, 2001; 60(3): 228 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. D. McKee and D. J. Yoo
The Effect of Surgery for Rotator Cuff Disease on General Health Status : Results of a Prospective Trial
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2000; 82(7): 970 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. G. Wright, N. L. Young, and J. P. Waddell
The Reliability and Validity of the Self-Reported Patient-Specific Index for Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2000; 82(6): 829 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
D. A Neumann
An Electromyographic Study of the Hip Abductor Muscles as Subjects With a Hip Prosthesis Walked With Different Methods of Using a Cane and Carrying a Load
Physical Therapy, December 1, 1999; 79(12): 1163 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
J. C Yen, C. Neville, and P. R Fortin
Discordance between patients and their physicians in the assessment of lupus disease activity: relevance for clinical trials
Lupus, October 1, 1999; 8(8): 660 - 670.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. B. O'NEILL
Open Lateral Retinacular Lengthening Compared with Arthroscopic Release. A Prospective, Randomized Outcome Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 1997; 79(12): 1759 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text]