This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FOUCHER, G.
Right arrow Articles by ALLIEU, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FOUCHER, G.
Right arrow Articles by ALLIEU, Y.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 78:1889-96 (1996)
© 1996 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Transfer of a Severely Damaged Digit to Reconstruct an Amputated Thumb*

GUY FOUCHER, M.D.{dagger}, STRASBOURG, SORAYA ROSTANE, M.D.{ddagger}, MICHEL CHAMMAS, M.D.{ddagger}, DAVID SMITH, M.D.§ and YVES ALLIEU, M.D.{ddagger}, MONTPELLIER, FRANCE

Investigation performed at SOS Main Strasbourg, Strasbourg, and SOS Main Montpellier, Montpellier

We retrospectively reviewed the results of reconstruction of a traumatically amputated thumb with use of an adjacent severely damaged digit in twenty-seven patients (twenty-five male and two female patients). The mean duration of follow-up was nine years (range, two to twenty-one years). The mean age at the time of the reconstruction was thirty-four years (range, thirteen to fifty-six years). Five patients had the reconstruction on the day of the injury and twenty-two, after a mean delay of five months (range, fifteen days to thirteen months). Segments of the index finger were used in twenty-two patients; of the long finger, in four patients; and of the ring finger, in one patient. There were four complications: necrosis of the dorsal skin in one patient, reflex sympathetic dystrophy in one patient, and contracture of the first web space in two patients. Discriminative sensibility was ten millimeters or less, according to the Weber test, in twenty-four thumbs. Cortical integration with reference to the recipient thumb, on stimulation of the pollicized segment, was good in ten patients. Eleven patients could achieve tip-to-tip contact between the thumb and the little finger and twenty-five patients, between the thumb and the most radial finger. The ability to perform activities of daily living was considered good for ten patients, fair for eleven, and poor for six. Only digits with a nail, either present on the transferred segment or as a result of a free vascularized nail transfer, were considered to have a good cosmetic result. Although these results are far from impressive, the reconstruction is a viable alternative for selected patients because it maintains the ability to grasp objects and to oppose the digits.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?