The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 78:1853-6 (1996)
© 1996 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Revision of the Acetabular Component of a Total Hip Arthroplasty with Cement in Young Patients without Rheumatoid Arthritis*
V. V. RAUT, M.B., M.S.(ORTH), M.CH.(ORTH), D.(ORTH), D.N.B.(ORTH) ,
P. D. SINEY, B.A. and
B. M. WROBLEWSKI, F.R.C.S. , WIGAN, UNITED KINGDOM
Investigation performed at The John Charnley Research Institute, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan.
The results for eighty-two young patients without rheumatoid arthritis who had had eighty-seven revisions of the acetabular component because of aseptic loosening were studied. The mean duration of follow-up was approximately six years (range, 1.9 to 18.1 years).
The clinical result was excellent or satisfactory for seventy-nine hips (91 per cent). However, at the latest radiographic assessment, twenty-six sockets were loose. Of the fifty hips that had had good bone stock (only slight enlargement of the acetabulum or local defects involving only one wall) before the revision, seven (14 per cent) had loosening of the socket, compared with nineteen (51 per cent) of the thirty-seven that had had poor bone stock (massive or global collapse of the acetabulum and defects involving at least two walls). The relationship between loosening and the quality of the bone stock before the revision was highly significant (p = 0.0002, chi-square test).
The results of revision of the socket with use of cement and without use of any bone grafts in young patients who have poor acetabular bone stock are not very encouraging. The need for regular follow-up of all patients who have had an arthroplasty cannot be overemphasized.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Davis, Z. Agnidis, E. Badley, A. Kiss, J. P. Waddell, and A. E. Gross
Predictors of Functional Outcome Two Years Following Revision Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
April 1, 2006;
88(4):
685 - 691.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. W. Schreurs, V. J.J.F. Busch, M. L. Welten, N. Verdonschot, T. J.J.H. Slooff, and J. W.M. Gardeniers
Acetabular Reconstruction with Impaction Bone-Grafting and a Cemented Cup in Patients Younger Than Fifty Years Old
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2004;
86(11):
2385 - 2392.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Saleh, J. Holtzman, A. Gafni, L. Saleh, A. Davis, S. Resig, and A. E. Gross
Reliability and Intraoperative Validity of Preoperative Assessment of Standardized Plain Radiographs in Predicting Bone Loss at Revision Hip Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2001;
83(7):
1040 - 1046.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. T. Dearborn and W. H. Harris
Acetabular Revision After Failed Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Congenital Hip Dislocation and Dysplasia : Results After a Mean of 8.6 Years
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2000;
82(8):
1146 - 1146.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. T. DEARBORN and W. H. HARRIS
High Placement of an Acetabular Component Inserted without Cement in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Results After a Mean of Ten Years
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
April 1, 1999;
81(4):
469 - 80.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|