The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 78:1728-34 (1996)
© 1996 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Biomechanical Consequences of Replacement of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with a Patellar Ligament Allograft. Part II: Forces in the Graft Compared with Forces in the Intact Ligament*
KEITH L. MARKOLF, PH.D. ,
DANIEL M. BURCHFIELD, M.D., PH.D. ,
MATTHEW M. SHAPIRO, M.D. ,
CHARLES W. CHA, M.D. ,
GERALD A. M. FINERMAN, M.D. and
JAMES L. SLAUTERBECK, M.D. , LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Biomechanics Research Section, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles
Seventeen fresh-frozen knee specimens from cadavera were instrumented with a load-cell attached to a mechanically isolated cylinder of subchondral bone containing the tibial insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament. The forces in the intact anterior cruciate ligament were recorded as the knee was passively extended from 90 degrees of flexion to 5 degrees of hyperextension without and with several constant tibial loads: 100 newtons of anterior tibial force, ten newton-meters of internal and external tibial torque, and ten newton-meters of varus and valgus moment. The anterior cruciate ligament was resected, and a bone-patellar ligament-bone graft was inserted. The knee was flexed to 30 degrees, and the graft was pre-tensioned to restore normal anterior-posterior laxity. The knee-loading experiments were repeated at this level of pre-tension (laxity-matched pre-tension) and at a level that was forty-five newtons greater than the laxity-matched pre-tension (over-tension). During passive extension of the knee, the forces in the graft were always greater than the corresponding forces in the intact anterior cruciate ligament. Over-tensioning of the graft increased the forces in the graft at all angles of flexion. At full extension, the mean force in the anterior cruciate ligament was fifty-six newtons; the mean force in the graft at laxity-matched pre-tension was 168 newtons, and it was 286 newtons in the over-tensioned graft. Greater pre-tensioning may be required when the knee demonstrates apparent tightening of the graft in flexion. The mean forces in the graft generated during all constant loading tests were greater than those for the intact anterior cruciate ligament over the range of flexion. When the graft was over-tensioned, the forces generated by the anterior tibial force and by varus and valgus moment increased but those generated by internal and external tibial torque did not. There was no significant change in the mean tibial rotation as a function of the angle of flexion of the knee after insertion of the graft; normal tibial rotation of the knee during passive extension (the so-called screw home mechanism) was eliminated.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When a patellar ligament allograft was pre-tensioned to restore normal anterior-posterior laxity, the forces in the graft were markedly greater than those in the intact anterior cruciate ligament. Thus, the penalty of increased forces in the graft must be accepted if anterior-posterior laxity is to be restored. Of particular concern are the large forces in the graft generated by loading states, such as external tibial torque and varus moment, which normally generate minimum force in the intact anterior cruciate ligament. In terms of force magnitude, internal torque applied to an extended knee is likely to be the most dangerous loading state for a patient who has a patellar ligament graft. There is a current trend toward early postoperative mobilization and intensive rehabilitation after substitution of the anterior cruciate ligament with a graft. Although this approach results in an excellent range of motion, the surgeon should be aware that a return to full activity could produce forces in the graft that are many times greater than those in the intact anterior cruciate ligament. For this reason, early return to full activity may not be indicated until full biological maturation of the graft.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Markolf, S. Park, S. R. Jackson, and D. R. McAllister
Simulated Pivot-Shift Testing with Single and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2008;
90(8):
1681 - 1689.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Markolf, B. R. Graves, S. M. Sigward, S. R. Jackson, and D. R. McAllister
Effects of Posterolateral Reconstructions on External Tibial Rotation and Forces in a Posterior Cruciate Ligament Graft
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2007;
89(11):
2351 - 2358.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Sigward, K. L. Markolf, B. R. Graves, J. M. Chacko, S. R. Jackson, and D. R. McAllister
Femoral Fixation Sites for Optimum Isometry of Posterolateral Reconstruction
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2007;
89(11):
2359 - 2368.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Markolf, B. R. Graves, S. M. Sigward, S. R. Jackson, and D. R. McAllister
How Well Do Anatomical Reconstructions of the Posterolateral Corner Restore Varus Stability to the Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee?
Am. J. Sports Med.,
July 1, 2007;
35(7):
1117 - 1122.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Pujol, M. P. R. Blanchi, and P. Chambat
The Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Among Competitive Alpine Skiers: A 25-year Investigation
Am. J. Sports Med.,
July 1, 2007;
35(7):
1070 - 1074.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Markolf, B. T. Feeley, S. R. Jackson, and D. R. McAllister
Biomechanical Studies of Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2006;
88(8):
1788 - 1794.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. E. DeFrate, R. Papannagari, T. J. Gill, J. M. Moses, N. P. Pathare, and G. Li
The 6 Degrees of Freedom Kinematics of the Knee After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency: An In Vivo Imaging Analysis
Am. J. Sports Med.,
August 1, 2006;
34(8):
1240 - 1246.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Markolf, B. T. Feeley, S. R. Jackson, and D. R. McAllister
Where Should the Femoral Tunnel of a Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Be Placed to Best Restore Anteroposterior Laxity and Ligament Forces?
Am. J. Sports Med.,
April 1, 2006;
34(4):
604 - 611.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Fitzpatrick, M. B. Sommers, B. C. C. Kam, J. L. Marsh, and M. Bottlang
Knee Stability After Articulated External Fixation
Am. J. Sports Med.,
November 1, 2005;
33(11):
1735 - 1741.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. V. West and C. D. Harner
Graft Selection in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
May 1, 2005;
13(3):
197 - 207.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Yamamoto, W.-H. Hsu, S. L-Y. Woo, A. H. Van Scyoc, Y. Takakura, and R. E. Debski
Knee Stability and Graft Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of a Lateral and an Anatomical Femoral Tunnel Placement
Am. J. Sports Med.,
December 1, 2004;
32(8):
1825 - 1832.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Nicholas, M. J. D'Amato, M. J. Mullaney, T. F. Tyler, K. Kolstad, and M. P. McHugh
A Prospectively Randomized Double-Blind Study on the Effect of Initial Graft Tension on Knee Stability After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med.,
December 1, 2004;
32(8):
1881 - 1886.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Camillieri, E. G. McFarland, L. E. Jasper, S. M. Belkoff, T. K. Kim, P. B. Rauh, and P. P. Mariani
A Biomechanical Evaluation of Transcondylar Femoral Fixation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts
Am. J. Sports Med.,
June 1, 2004;
32(4):
950 - 955.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Simmons, S. M. Howell, and M. L. Hull
Effect of the Angle of the Femoral and Tibial Tunnels in the Coronal Plane and Incremental Excision of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament on Tension of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft: An in Vitro Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 28, 2003;
85(6):
1018 - 1029.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. T. Nurmi, P. Kannus, H. Sievanen, M. Jarvinen, and T. L. N. Jarvinen
Compaction Drilling Does Not Increase the Initial Fixation Strength of the Hamstring Tendon Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Cadaver Model
Am. J. Sports Med.,
May 1, 2003;
31(3):
353 - 358.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Singhatat, K. W. Lawhorn, S. M. Howell, and M. L. Hull
How Four Weeks of Implantation Affect the Strength and Stiffness of a Tendon Graft in a Bone Tunnel: A Study of Two Fixation Devices in an Extraarticular Model in Ovine
Am. J. Sports Med.,
July 1, 2002;
30(4):
506 - 513.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Markolf, S. L. Hame, D. M. Hunter, D. Oakes, and P. Gause
Biomechanical Effects of Femoral Notchplasty in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med.,
January 1, 2002;
30(1):
83 - 89.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Hoher, A. Kanamori, J. Zeminski, F. H. Fu, and S. L-Y. Woo
The Position of the Tibia during Graft Fixation Affects Knee Kinematics and Graft Forces for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med.,
November 1, 2001;
29(6):
771 - 776.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Howell, M. E. Gittins, J. E. Gottlieb, S. M. Traina, and T. M. Zoellner
The Relationship between the Angle of the Tibial Tunnel in the Coronal Plane and Loss of Flexion and Anterior Laxity after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med.,
September 1, 2001;
29(5):
567 - 574.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Millett, T. L. Wickiewicz, and R. F. Warren
Motion Loss after Ligament Injuries to the Knee: Part I: Causes
Am. J. Sports Med.,
September 1, 2001;
29(5):
664 - 675.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Kousa, T. L.N. Jarvinen, P. Kannus, and M. Jarvinen
Initial Fixation Strength of Bioabsorbable and Titanium Interference Screws in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Biomechanical Evaluation by Single Cycle and Cyclic Loading
Am. J. Sports Med.,
July 1, 2001;
29(4):
420 - 425.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Brand Jr, D. Pienkowski, E. Steenlage, D. Hamilton, D. L. Johnson, and D. N.M. Caborn
Interference Screw Fixation Strength of a Quadrupled Hamstring Tendon Graft Is Directly Related to Bone Mineral Density and Insertion Torque
Am. J. Sports Med.,
September 1, 2000;
28(5):
705 - 710.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Brand Jr., A. Weiler, D. N. M. Caborn, C. H. Brown Jr., and D. L. Johnson
Graft Fixation in Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med.,
September 1, 2000;
28(5):
761 - 774.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. F. LaPrade, S. Resig, F. Wentorf, and J. L. Lewis
The Effects of Grade III Posterolateral Knee Complex Injuries on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Force: A Biomechanical Analysis
Am. J. Sports Med.,
July 1, 1999;
27(4):
469 - 475.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Howell, M. P. Wallace, M. L. Hull, and M. L. Deutsch
Evaluation of the Single-Incision Arthroscopic Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Replacement: A Study of Tibial Tunnel Placement, Intraoperative Graft Tension, and Stability
Am. J. Sports Med.,
May 1, 1999;
27(3):
284 - 293.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. E. Magen, S. M. Howell, and M. L. Hull
Structural Properties of Six Tibial Fixation Methods for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Soft Tissue Grafts
Am. J. Sports Med.,
January 1, 1999;
27(1):
35 - 43.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. D. Barber-Westin, F. R. Noyes, T. P. Heckmann, and B. L. Shaffer
The Effect of Exercise and Rehabilitation on Anterior-Posterior Knee Displacements After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Autograft Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med.,
January 1, 1999;
27(1):
84 - 93.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. MARKOLF, J. R. SLAUTERBECK, K. L. ARMSTRONG, M. S. SHAPIRO, and G. A. M. FINERMAN
A Biomechanical Study of Replacement of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament with a Graft. Part II: Forces in the Graft Compared with Forces in the Intact Ligament
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 1997;
79(3):
381 - 6.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. MARKOLF, D. M. BURCHFIELD, M. M. SHAPIRO, B. R. DAVIS, G. A. M. FINERMAN, and J. L. SLAUTERBECK
Biomechanical Consequences of Replacement of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with a Patellar Ligament Allograft. Part I: Insertion of the Graft and Anterior-Posterior Testing
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 1996;
78(11):
1720 - 7.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|