The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 78:1690-5 (1996)
© 1996 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Alternative Operative Exposures of the Posterior Aspect of the Humeral Diaphysis. With Reference to the Radial Nerve*
MICHELLE GERWIN, M.D. ,
ROBERT N. HOTCHKISS, M.D. and
ANDREW J. WEILAND, M.D., NEW YORK, N.Y.
Investigation performed at The Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City
An anatomical study was performed to define the course of the radial nerve in the posterior aspect of the arm, with particular reference to its relationship to operative exposures of the posterior aspect of the humeral diaphysis. In ten cadaveric specimens, the radial nerve was found to cross the posterior aspect of the humerus from an average of 20.7 ± 1.2 centimeters proximal to the medial epicondyle to 14.2 ± 0.6 centimeters proximal to the lateral epicondyle. As it crossed the posterior aspect of the humerus in each specimen, the nerve had several branches to the lateral head of the triceps; however, no branches were found innervating the medial head of the triceps in the posterior aspect of any of the specimens. At the lateral aspect of the humerus, the nerve trifurcated into a branch to the medial head of the triceps, the lower lateral brachial cutaneous nerve, and the continuation of the radial nerve into the distal part of the upper arm and the forearm.
Three operative approaches were performed in each specimen. The posterior triceps-splitting approach exposed an average of 15.4 ± 0.8 centimeters of the humerus from the lateral epicondyle to the point at which the radial nerve crossed the posterior aspect of the humerus. For the second approach, the radial nerve was mobilized proximally to allow an additional six centimeters of the humeral diaphysis to be visualized. The third approach (the modified posterior approach) involved the identification of the radial nerve distally as it crossed the lateral aspect of the humerus, followed by reflection of both the lateral and the medial heads of the triceps medially. This exposure permitted visualization of 26.2 ± 0.4 centimeters of the humeral diaphysis from the lateral epicondyle proximally.
The results after use of the modified posterior approach in seven patients were also reviewed.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
J. O. Anglen, M. T. Archdeacon, L. K. Cannada, and D. Herscovici Jr.
Avoiding Complications in the Treatment of Humeral Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2008;
90(7):
1580 - 1589.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Steinmann and E. V. Cheung
Treatment of Periprosthetic Humerus Fractures Associated With Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
April 1, 2008;
16(4):
199 - 207.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mohammed Saqib Zafar and K. Porter
Humeral shaft fractures: a review of literature
Trauma,
October 1, 2007;
9(4):
273 - 282.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Zlotolow, L. W. Catalano III, O. A. Barron, and S. Z. Glickel
Surgical Exposures of the Humerus
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
December 1, 2006;
14(13):
754 - 765.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Hierholzer, D. Sama, J. B. Toro, M. Peterson, and D. L. Helfet
Plate Fixation of Ununited Humeral Shaft Fractures: Effect of Type of Bone Graft on Healing
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2006;
88(7):
1442 - 1447.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Anglen
Distal Humerus Fractures
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
September 1, 2005;
13(5):
291 - 297.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. H. Goldberg, M. S. Cohen, M. Young, and B. Bradnock
Thermal Tissue Damage Caused by Ultrasonic Cement Removal from the Humerus
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2005;
87(3):
583 - 591.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
