This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LONNER, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by ZUCKERMAN, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LONNER, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by ZUCKERMAN, J. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 78:1553-8 (1996)
© 1996 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

The Reliability of Analysis of Intraoperative Frozen Sections for Identifying Active Infection during Revision Hip or Knee Arthroplasty*{dagger}

JESS H. LONNER, M.D.{ddagger}, PANNA DESAI, M.D.{ddagger}, PAUL E. DICESARE, M.D.{ddagger}, GERMAN STEINER, M.D.{ddagger} and JOSEPH D. ZUCKERMAN, M.D.{ddagger}, NEW YORK, N.Y.

Investigation performed at the Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York City

A prospective study was performed to determine the reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for the identification of infection during 175 consecutive revision total joint arthroplasties (142 hip and thirty-three knee). The mean interval between the primary and the revision arthroplasty was 7.3 years (range, three months to twenty-three years). To reduce selections bias, tissue was obtained for frozen sections during all revisions in patients who did not have active drainage from the wound or a sinus tract. Of the 175 patients, twenty-three had at least five polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field on analysis of the frozen sections and were considered to have an infection. Of these twenty-three, five had five to nine polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field and eighteen had at least ten polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field. The frozen sections for the remaining 152 patients were considered negative. On the basis of cultures of specimens obtained at the time of the revision operation, nineteen of the 175 patients were considered to have an infection. Of the 152 patients who had negative frozen sections, three were considered to have an infection on the basis of the results of the final cultures. Of the twenty-three patients who had positive frozen sections, sixteen were considered to have an infection on the basis of the results of the final cultures; all sixteen had frozen sections that had demonstrated at least ten polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field. The sensitivity and specificity of the frozen sections were similar regardless of whether an index of five or ten polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field was used. Analysis of the frozen sections had a sensitivity of 84 per cent for both indices, whereas the specificity was 96 per cent when the index was five polymorphonuclear leukocytes and 99 per cent when it was ten polymorphonuclear leukocytes. However, the positive predictive value of the frozen sections increased significantly (p < 0.05), from 70 to 89 per cent, when the index increased from five to ten polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field. The negative predictive value of the frozen sections was 98 per cent for both indices. The current study suggests that it is valuable to obtain tissue for intraoperative frozen sections during revision hip and knee arthroplasty. At least ten polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field was predictive of infection, while five to nine polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field was not necessarily consistent with infection. Less than five polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field reliably indicated the absence of infection.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. F. Schinsky, C. J. Della Valle, S. M. Sporer, and W. G. Paprosky
Perioperative Testing for Joint Infection in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2008; 90(9): 1869 - 1875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
P. Birmingham, J. M. Helm, P. A. Manner, and R. S. Tuan
Simulated Joint Infection Assessment by Rapid Detection of Live Bacteria with Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2008; 90(3): 602 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
N. V. Greidanus, B. A. Masri, D. S. Garbuz, S. D. Wilson, M. G. McAlinden, M. Xu, and C. P. Duncan
Use of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein Level to Diagnose Infection Before Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Prospective Evaluation
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2007; 89(7): 1409 - 1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
G. Bori, A. Soriano, S. Garcia, C. Mallofre, J. Riba, and J. Mensa
Usefulness of Histological Analysis for Predicting the Presence of Microorganisms at the Time of Reimplantation After Hip Resection Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Infection
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2007; 89(6): 1232 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
J. Parvizi, E. Ghanem, S. Menashe, R. L. Barrack, and T. W. Bauer
Periprosthetic Infection: What Are the Diagnostic Challenges?
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2006; 88(suppl_4): 138 - 147.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
E. Fulkerson, C. J. D. Valle, B. Wise, M. Walsh, C. Preston, and P. E. Di Cesare
Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacteria Infecting Total Joint Arthroplasty Sites
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2006; 88(6): 1231 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
T. W. Bauer, J. Parvizi, N. Kobayashi, and V. Krebs
Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2006; 88(4): 869 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
J. M. Leone and A. D. Hanssen
Management of Infection at the Site of a Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2005; 87(10): 2335 - 2348.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
P. E. Di Cesare, E. Chang, C. F. Preston, and C.-j. Liu
Serum Interleukin-6 as a Marker of Periprosthetic Infection Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2005; 87(9): 1921 - 1927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
A D Musso, K Mohanty, and R Spencer-Jones
Role of frozen section histology in diagnosis of infection during revision arthroplasty
Postgrad. Med. J., October 1, 2003; 79(936): 590 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
F. De Winter, C. Van de Wiele, D. Vogelaers, K. De Smet, R. Verdonk, and R. A. Dierckx
Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography: A Highly Accurate Imaging Modality for the Diagnosis of Chronic Musculoskeletal Infections
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2001; 83(5): 651 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
F. S. HADDAD, B. A. MASRI, D. S. GARBUZ, and C. P. DUNCAN
Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Femoral Bone Loss in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Classification and Preoperative Planning*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1999; 81(10): 1483 - 98.
[Full Text]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. J. SPANGEHL, B. A. MASRI, J. X. O'CONNELL, and C. P. DUNCAN
Prospective Analysis of Preoperative and Intraoperative Investigations for the Diagnosis of Infection at the Sites of Two Hundred and Two Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1999; 81(5): 672 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
C. J. DELLA VALLE, E. BOGNER, P. DESAI, J. H. LONNER, E. ADLER, J. D. ZUCKERMAN, and P. E. DI CESARE
Analysis of Frozen Sections of Intraoperative Specimens Obtained at the Time of Reoperation After Hip or Knee Resection Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Infection
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1999; 81(5): 684 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
B. L. Atkins, N. Athanasou, J. J. Deeks, D. W. M. Crook, H. Simpson, T. E. A. Peto, P. McLardy-Smith, A. R. Berendt, and T. O. C. S. Group
Prospective Evaluation of Criteria for Microbiological Diagnosis of Prosthetic-Joint Infection at Revision Arthroplasty
J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 1998; 36(10): 2932 - 2939.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. J. SPANGEHL, A. S. E. YOUNGER, B. A. MASRI, and C. P. DUNCAN
Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Diagnosis of Infection following Total Hip Arthroplasty*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1997; 79(10): 1578 - 88.
[Full Text]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
N. A. Athanasou, R. Pandey, R. de Steiger, P. McLardy Smith, D. S. Feldman, J. H. Lonner, P. Desai, and J. D. Zuckerman
Correspondence
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 1997; 79(9): 1433 - 4.
[Full Text]