This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wright, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cofield, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wright, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cofield, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 9 1340-1346, Copyright © 1995 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty

TW Wright and RH Cofield
Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

Nine humeral fractures occurred subsequent to 499 shoulder arthroplasties that had been performed between December 1978 and November 1987 at the Mayo Clinic. The time from the arthroplasty to the fracture averaged thirty-nine months (range, eight to 101 months). Seven patients were women and two were men, and the average age was seventy years (range, forty-five to eighty-five years). The arthroplasties were performed for rheumatoid arthritis in five patients and for the sequelae of trauma in four. Six patients had advanced osteopenia, and two had had an ipsilateral total elbow arthroplasty. Six of the fractures were centered at the tip of the prosthesis; one fracture (type A) extended proximally, and five (type B) did not. The three remaining fractures (type C) involved the humeral shaft distal to the implant and extended into the distal humeral metaphysis. Four fractures healed with non-operative treatment. Two fractures that had unacceptable alignment were treated successfully with operative intervention. Three fractures that were treated with immobilization in a splint failed to heal; two of those fractures eventually united after a revision of the prosthesis and bone-grafting was performed, and one fracture remained ununited. Radial nerve palsy developed postoperatively in two patients, and it resolved within three months. Five patients had poor active motion before the fracture, and two of them had even less motion after the fracture was treated. Our experience suggests that long oblique and spiral fractures can be successfully treated non-operatively, provided that the skeletal alignment is acceptable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
S. P. Steinmann and E. V. Cheung
Treatment of Periprosthetic Humerus Fractures Associated With Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., April 1, 2008; 16(4): 199 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. Kumar, J. W. Sperling, G. H. Haidukewych, and R. H. Cofield
Periprosthetic Humeral Fractures After Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 680 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. R. J. GILL, R. H. COFIELD, and B. F. MORREY
Ipsilateral Total Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasties in Patients Who Have Rheumatoid Arthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 1999; 81(8): 1128 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text]