This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olson, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sharkey, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olson, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sharkey, N. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 8 1184-1192, Copyright © 1995 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Biomechanical consequences of fracture and repair of the posterior wall of the acetabulum

SA Olson, BK Bay, MW Chapman and NA Sharkey
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento 95817, USA.

We measured the distribution of contact area and pressure between the acetabulum and the femoral head of cadaveric pelves in three different conditions: intact, with an operatively created fracture of the posterior wall, and after anatomical reduction and fixation of the fracture with a buttress plate and interfragmentary screws. The study involved eight cadaveric hip joints from five pelves loaded to 2000 newtons in simulated single-limb stance. Measurements were made with pressure-sensitive film. The acetabulum was divided into three areas--the anterior wall, the superior aspect, and the posterior wall--for the analysis of the data. Creation of a fracture of the posterior wall was followed by an increase in contact area, maximum pressure, and contact force in the superior aspect of the acetabulum. A concomitant decrease in these parameters was observed in the anterior and posterior walls. Anatomical reduction and fixation of the fracture with a plate and screws did not restore the pattern of loading to pre-injury levels.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
D. R. Dirschl, J. L. Marsh, J. A. Buckwalter, R. Gelberman, S. A. Olson, T. D. Brown, and A. Llinias
Articular Fractures
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2004; 12(6): 416 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. L. Marsh, J. Buckwalter, R. Gelberman, D. Dirschl, S. Olson, T. Brown, and A. Llinias
Articular Fractures: Does an Anatomic Reduction Really Change the Result?
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 9, 2002; 84(7): 1259 - 1271.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. R. Moed, S. E. WillsonCarr, and J. T. Watson
Results of Operative Treatment of Fractures of the Posterior Wall of the Acetabulum
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2002; 84(5): 752 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. A. KONRATH, A. J. HAMEL, S. A. OLSON, B. BAY, and N. A. SHARKEY
The Role of the Acetabular Labrum and the Transverse Acetabular Ligament in Load Transmission in the Hip
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 1998; 80(12): 1781 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text]