This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chew, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Smirniotopoulos, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chew, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Smirniotopoulos, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 7 1080-1086, Copyright © 1995 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

Teaching skeletal radiology with use of computer-assisted instruction with interactive videodisc

FS Chew and JG Smirniotopoulos
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC 20306, USA.

We evaluated the effectiveness and logistical practicality of use of a program consisting of computer-assisted instruction with interactive videodisc to teach residents in orthopaedic surgery the radiology of musculoskeletal injuries. Eleven residents (four in the fourth year of postgraduate training, five in the third year, one in the second year, and one whose level of training was not recorded) used the computer-videodisc program in a single session with no supervision. The residents took a pre-test and a post-test and also filled out a questionnaire on the efficacy and usefulness of this program compared with other educational materials. The eleven residents improved their scores from 56 +/- 8.6 per cent correct answers (mean and standard deviation) (range, 44 to 69 per cent correct answers) on the pre-test to 86 +/- 9.2 per cent correct answers (range, 69 to 100 per cent correct answers) on the post-test. All of the residents improved their scores, and the improvements were significant (p < 0.001; effect size, 3.57). The residents thought that the program increased their interest in the subject, and they preferred the computer-videodisc program to the use of actual radiographs, textbooks, videotapes, and slides and audiotapes for individual study. The residents reported no difficulty in using the program or the electronic equipment.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic AssociationHome page
J. D. Thatcher
Computer Animation and Improved Student Comprehension of Basic Science Concepts
J Am Osteopath Assoc, January 1, 2006; 106(1): 9 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]