This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Engh, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bobyn, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Engh, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bobyn, J. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 6 903-910, Copyright © 1995 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Evaluation of bone ingrowth in proximally and extensively porous-coated anatomic medullary locking prostheses retrieved at autopsy

CA Engh, JP Hooten, KF Zettl-Schaffer, M Ghaffarpour, TF McGovern and JD Bobyn
Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, Arlington, Virginia 22206, USA.

Three proximally (40 per cent) and five extensively (80 per cent) porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral components were retrieved from seven cadavera at autopsy. Each component (with the surrounding, intact femur), was sectioned transversely at one-centimeter intervals. Backscattered scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate circumferentially the interface between the bone and the porous surface of each section. Bone ingrowth was considered to be present within a field when bone was in contact with the outermost layer of the sintered beads, it was detected within the porous space, and it had penetrated the porous space to a depth of at least one bead diameter. All eight components had some bone growth into the porous space. A mean of 35 per cent of the surface of the implants had bone ingrowth. In the areas where bone was present, 67 per cent of the available porous space on the extensively coated stems and 74 per cent on the proximally coated stems contained bone. With both types of implants, the greatest amount of compact bone ingrowth was found at the level where the porous coating ended. Transverse sections obtained at this level frequently demonstrated that bone ingrowth had occurred circumferentially and that the ingrowth was continuous with and an integral part of the femoral cortex. These direct connections to the cortex could be predicted from the appearance of the radiographs. In the most proximal transverse sections of both types of implants, bone was most frequently connected to the medial side and corners of the implant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. Akhavan, M. M. Matthiesen, L. Schulte, T. Penoyar, M. J. Kraay, C. M. Rimnac, and V. M. Goldberg
Clinical and Histologic Results Related to a Low-Modulus Composite Total Hip Replacement Stem
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2006; 88(6): 1308 - 1314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. M. Wright, P. M. Pellicci, E. A. Salvati, B. Ghelman, M. M. Roberts, and J. L. Koh
Bone Density Adjacent to Press-Fit Acetabular Components : A Prospective Analysis with Quantitative Computed Tomography
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2001; 83(4): 529 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
W. L. JAFFE and D. F. SCOTT
Current Concepts Review - Total Hip Arthroplasty with Hydroxyapatite-Coated Prostheses
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 1996; 78(12): 1918 - 34.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. A. Engh, T. M. Keaveny, and D. L. Bartel
Correspondence
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 1996; 78(2): 312 - 3.
[Full Text]