This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rasmussen, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rasmussen, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, M. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 5 751-759, Copyright © 1995 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Arthrodesis of the knee with a vascularized fibular rotatory graft

MR Rasmussen, AT Bishop and MB Wood
Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

We retrospectively reviewed the records of thirteen patients who had been managed with an arthrodesis of the knee with use of a vascularized graft from the ipsilateral fibula and fixation with an intramedullary rod. The indications for the operation included a large skeletal defect secondary to the resection of a tumor about the knee in eight patients, an infection at the site of an arthroplasty in four (with failure of a previous conventional arthrodesis in three of the four), and severe rheumatoid gonarthrosis as well as a persistent non-union of the distal part of the femur in one. The average age of the patients at the time of the operation was forty-three years (range, twenty-six to seventy-six years). Most of the patients had had multiple previous procedures (thirty-three operations had been performed in ten patients). Twelve of the thirteen patients had a solid fusion and a successful result after an average duration of follow-up of fifty-one months (range, eight to ninety-three months). The remaining patient, who had had four previous arthroplasties, had a recurrence of an infection seven months after the operation and was managed with an amputation. Six complications--including two superficial wound infections, one deep wound infection, one deep venous thrombosis, one transient peroneal-nerve palsy, and one delayed union--occurred in three patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. H. MacDonald, S. Agarwal, M. P. Lorei, N. A. Johanson, and A. A. Freiberg
Knee arthrodesis.
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2006; 14(3): 154 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. D. Conway, M. A. Mont, and H. P. Bezwada
Arthrodesis of the Knee
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 835 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. S. ARROYO, K. L. GARVIN, and J. R. NEFF
Arthrodesis of the Knee with a Modular Titanium Intramedullary Nail
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 1997; 79(1): 26 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text]