This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delamarter, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Dawson, E. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Delamarter, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Dawson, E. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 4 578-584, Copyright © 1995 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging

RB Delamarter, MW Howard, T Goldstein, AL Deutsch, JH Mink and EG Dawson
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine 90024, USA.

We evaluated magnetic resonance imaging studies of thirty patients before and after a contained herniation of a lumbar disc was treated with a percutaneous lumbar discectomy. The imaging studies were evaluated to determine whether the preoperative appearance of the herniated disc was predictive of the outcome of percutaneous discectomy and also to determine a possible mechanism of action of the procedure in the relief of symptoms. The index operation was successful in seventeen (57 per cent) of the thirty patients. The preoperative imaging studies showed no differences in the appearance of the discs that went on to have a successful result and those that went on to have an unsuccessful result. Imaging studies made four to six weeks after the operation showed no measurable changes in the morphology of the disc. Imaging studies made a mean of fourteen months after the operation showed no changes in the morphology of the disc in twenty-four (80 per cent) of the patients, irrespective of the clinical outcome. Only three of the seventeen patients who had a successful result had a reduction of more than two millimeters in the size of the herniated segment, and two of the thirteen patients who had an unsuccessful result had an increase of more than one millimeter in the size of the herniated segment. We found that preoperative imaging studies cannot predict the clinical outcome of percutaneous lumbar discectomy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
A. Biyani and G. B. J. Andersson
Low Back Pain: Pathophysiology and Management
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2004; 12(2): 106 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
O. A. Cvitanic, J. Schimandle, G. D. Casper, and P. F. J. Tirman
Subchondral Marrow Changes After Laser Diskectomy in the Lumbar Spine: MR Imaging Findings and Clinical Correlation
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1363 - 1369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]