This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faciszewski, T.
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Faciszewski, T.
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 4 530-537, Copyright © 1995 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Segmental spinal dysgenesis. A disorder different from spinal agenesis

T Faciszewski, RB Winter, JE Lonstein, S Sane and D Erickson
Minnesota Spine Center, Minneapolis 55454-1419, USA.

We reviewed the clinical and roentgenographic findings, treatment, and results for seventeen patients (six male and eleven female) who had segmental spinal dysgenesis, a disorder frequently confused with, but distinct from, lumbar and lumbosacral agenesis. The average age at the time of presentation to the Minnesota Spine Center or the Gillette Children's Hospital was two and a half years (range, newborn to twenty-one years), and the average duration of follow-up was eight years (range, five months to twenty-two years). At the time of the diagnosis, eight patients had neurological deficits: seven had a neurogenic bladder and four had weakness of the lower extremities. An average of 2.6 procedures (range, one to five procedures) was needed to obtain a solid fusion. Decompression of the stenotic canal was performed in ten patients, and it was followed by an improvement in neurological function in two of them. A solid fusion of the spine, arrest of the progressive kyphosis, and stabilization of neurological function were obtained in all patients. We recommend early anterior and posterior arthrodesis in patients who have segmental spinal dysgenesis, as the progressive kyphosis that inevitably develops often results in neurological deficits.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
A. Weber, R. F Maier, U. Felderhoff-Mueser, R. Lehmann, B. Stover, and M. Obladen
Neonate With Spinal Hypoplasia on T12 and a Localized Vertebral Malformation on L4
J Child Neurol, August 1, 2001; 16(8): 619 - 621.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P. Tortori-Donati, M. P. Fondelli, A. Rossi, C. A. Raybaud, A. Cama, and V. Capra
Segmental Spinal Dysgenesis: Neuroradiologic Findings with Clinical and Embryologic Correlation
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 1999; 20(3): 445 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text]