The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 12 1807-1813, Copyright © 1995 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty

DS Feldman, JH Lonner, P Desai and JD Zuckerman
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, N.Y. 10003, USA.

We performed a retrospective analysis of thirty-three consecutive total hip and knee (twenty-three hip and ten knee) revision arthroplasties during which intraoperative frozen sections were analyzed. Data for the study were collected by means of a review of the charts, radiographic analysis, and evaluation of both frozen and permanent histological sections. The frozen sections, of periprosthetic tissue at the bone-cement interface or the pseudocapsule, were considered positive for active infection if there were more than five polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field in at least five distinct microscopic fields. All patients were available for follow-up, at an average of thirty-six months (range, seventeen to seventy-nine months) after the initial revision operation. The frozen sections from ten patients were positive for infection, and those from twenty-three patients were negative. Comparison of the results of the analyses of the frozen sections (both positive and negative) with those of the analyses of the permanent histological sections of similar tissue showed a correlation of 100 per cent (sensitivity, 1.00; specificity, 1.00; and accuracy, 1.00). Nine patients had positive intraoperative cultures, and all of them had positive frozen sections (sensitivity, 1.00). Of the twenty-four patients who had negative intraoperative cultures, twenty-three had negative frozen sections (specificity, 0.96). Of the nine patients who had positive intraoperative cultures, only two were found to have infection on intraoperative gram-staining. The surgeon's operative assessment regarding the presence of infection, compared with the final pathological diagnosis, demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.70, a specificity of 0.87, and an accuracy of 0.82. All ten patients who had positive frozen sections were managed with excision arthroplasty; six of them subsequently had reimplantation, and the excision was the definitive procedure in the remaining four. One patient who had had a delayed reimplantation had a secondary skin slough and eventually was managed with an arthrodesis of the knee. In the group that had negative frozen sections, eighteen patients had a primary exchange revision arthroplasty and five had a delayed reimplantation. At the time of follow-up, one patient who had had a delayed reimplantation had radiographic loosening of the femoral component and was asymptomatic. One patient who had had a primary exchange arthroplasty was managed with a second revision because of aseptic loosening. There was no clinical recurrence of infection in any patient. The data indicate that analysis of frozen sections of periprosthetic tissue is a reliable predictor of the presence of active infection during revision joint arthroplasty. We recommend its use to differentiate aseptic from septic loosening.
CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Facebook    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Bejon, A. Berendt, B. L. Atkins, N. Green, H. Parry, S. Masters, P. Mclardy-Smith, R. Gundle, and I. Byren Two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection: predictors of outcome and the role of reimplantation microbiology J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2010; 65(3): 569 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Morgan, P. Sharkey, E. Ghanem, J. Parvizi, J. C. Clohisy, R. S. J. Burnett, and R. L. Barrack The Value of Intraoperative Gram Stain in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2009; 91(9): 2124 - 2129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Byren, P. Bejon, B. L. Atkins, B. Angus, S. Masters, P. McLardy-Smith, R. Gundle, and A. Berendt One hundred and twelve infected arthroplasties treated with 'DAIR' (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention): antibiotic duration and outcome J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2009; 63(6): 1264 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Ghanem, J. Parvizi, R. S. J. Burnett, P. F. Sharkey, N. Keshavarzi, A. Aggarwal, and R. L. Barrack Cell Count and Differential of Aspirated Fluid in the Diagnosis of Infection at the Site of Total Knee Arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2008; 90(8): 1637 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Birmingham, J. M. Helm, P. A. Manner, and R. S. Tuan Simulated Joint Infection Assessment by Rapid Detection of Live Bacteria with Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2008; 90(3): 602 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. V. Greidanus, B. A. Masri, D. S. Garbuz, S. D. Wilson, M. G. McAlinden, M. Xu, and C. P. Duncan Use of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein Level to Diagnose Infection Before Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Prospective Evaluation J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2007; 89(7): 1409 - 1416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Bori, A. Soriano, S. Garcia, C. Mallofre, J. Riba, and J. Mensa Usefulness of Histological Analysis for Predicting the Presence of Microorganisms at the Time of Reimplantation After Hip Resection Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Infection J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2007; 89(6): 1232 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Parvizi, E. Ghanem, S. Menashe, R. L. Barrack, and T. W. Bauer Periprosthetic Infection: What Are the Diagnostic Challenges? J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2006; 88(suppl_4): 138 - 147. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Fulkerson, C. J. D. Valle, B. Wise, M. Walsh, C. Preston, and P. E. Di Cesare Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacteria Infecting Total Joint Arthroplasty Sites J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2006; 88(6): 1231 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L Morawietz, R-A Classen, J H Schroder, C Dynybil, C Perka, A Skwara, J Neidel, T Gehrke, L Frommelt, T Hansen, et al. Proposal for a histopathological consensus classification of the periprosthetic interface membrane. J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2006; 59(6): 591 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. W. Bauer, J. Parvizi, N. Kobayashi, and V. Krebs Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2006; 88(4): 869 - 882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Love, S. E. Marwin, M. B. Tomas, E. S. Krauss, G. G. Tronco, K. K. Bhargava, K. J. Nichols, and C. J. Palestro Diagnosing Infection in the Failed Joint Replacement: A Comparison of Coincidence Detection 18F-FDG and 111In-Labeled Leukocyte/99mTc-Sulfur Colloid Marrow Imaging J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 1864 - 1871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. M. Stumpe, H. P. Notzli, M. Zanetti, E. M. Kamel, T. F. Hany, G. W. Gorres, G. K. von Schulthess, and J. Hodler FDG PET for Differentiation of Infection and Aseptic Loosening in Total Hip Replacements: Comparison with Conventional Radiography and Three-Phase Bone Scintigraphy Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 333 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Love, M. B. Tomas, S. E. Marwin, P. V. Pugliese, and C. J. Palestro Role of Nuclear Medicine in Diagnosis of the Infected Joint Replacement RadioGraphics, September 1, 2001; 21(5): 1229 - 1238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Tunney, S. Patrick, M. D. Curran, G. Ramage, D. Hanna, J. R. Nixon, S. P. Gorman, R. I. Davis, and N. Anderson Detection of Prosthetic Hip Infection at Revision Arthroplasty by Immunofluorescence Microscopy and PCR Amplification of the Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 1999; 37(10): 3281 - 3290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. SPANGEHL, B. A. MASRI, J. X. O'CONNELL, and C. P. DUNCAN Prospective Analysis of Preoperative and Intraoperative Investigations for the Diagnosis of Infection at the Sites of Two Hundred and Two Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1999; 81(5): 672 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. J. DELLA VALLE, E. BOGNER, P. DESAI, J. H. LONNER, E. ADLER, J. D. ZUCKERMAN, and P. E. DI CESARE Analysis of Frozen Sections of Intraoperative Specimens Obtained at the Time of Reoperation After Hip or Knee Resection Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Infection J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1999; 81(5): 684 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. L. Atkins, N. Athanasou, J. J. Deeks, D. W. M. Crook, H. Simpson, T. E. A. Peto, P. McLardy-Smith, A. R. Berendt, and T. O. C. S. Group Prospective Evaluation of Criteria for Microbiological Diagnosis of Prosthetic-Joint Infection at Revision Arthroplasty J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 1998; 36(10): 2932 - 2939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. HANSSEN and J. A. RAND Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Evaluation and Treatment of Infection at the Site of a Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty*{{dagger}} J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1998; 80(6): 910 - 22. [Full Text]

				M. J. SPANGEHL, A. S. E. YOUNGER, B. A. MASRI, and C. P. DUNCAN Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Diagnosis of Infection following Total Hip Arthroplasty*{{dagger}} J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1997; 79(10): 1578 - 88. [Full Text]

				J. BERNSTEIN Current Concepts Review - Decision Analysis J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 1997; 79(9): 1404 - 14. [Full Text]

				J. H. LONNER, P. DESAI, P. E. DICESARE, G. STEINER, and J. D. ZUCKERMAN The Reliability of Analysis of Intraoperative Frozen Sections for Identifying Active Infection during Revision Hip or Knee Arthroplasty*{{dagger}} J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1996; 78(10): 1553 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text]