This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McAfee, P.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McAfee, P.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 12 1791-1800, Copyright © 1995 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

One-stage anterior cervical decompression and posterior stabilization. A study of one hundred patients with a minimum of two years of follow-up

PC McAfee, HH Bohlman, TB Ducker, SM Zeidman and JA Goldstein
Spine and Scoliosis Center, St. Joseph's Hospital, Baltimore, USA.

One hundred patients were managed with one-stage anterior decompression and posterior stabilization of the cervical spine. The underlying indication for the operation was cervical trauma in thirty-one patients; a neoplasm with a pathological fracture or an incomplete neurological deficit in fifty-five; and a miscellaneous condition, such as infection, rheumatoid arthritis, or cervical spondylotic myelopathy, in fourteen. The duration of follow-up ranged from twenty-four to 108 months (mean, thirty-two months) for the living patients. Sixteen patients had the procedure after the failure of an operation that had been performed elsewhere. The development of more biomechanically rigid cervical instrumentation did not obviate the need for a combined anterior and posterior approach. Twenty-six patients (26 per cent) had supplemental cervical instrumentation as part of the circumferential arthrodesis: seventeen had insertion of an anterior cervical plate and nine had insertion of a posterior facet plate. There were no iatrogenic neurological deficits. Of the seventy-five patients who had had a neurological deficit preoperatively, fifty-one improved one grade and six improved two grades according to the system of Frankel et al. Of the thirty-five patients who had not been able to walk preoperatively, twenty-one regained enough motor strength to walk postoperatively. Because the anterior and posterior procedures were performed during one session of general anesthesia, the prevalence of perioperative complications related to the airway was lower than that previously reported in the literature. No patient had an obstruction of the airway.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
K. Singh, D. Samartzis, J. G. Heller, H. S. An, and A. R. Vaccaro
The management of complex soft-tissue defects after spinal instrumentation
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2006; 88-B(1): 8 - 15.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. DANIEL RIEW, A. S. HILIBRAND, M. A. PALUMBO, and H. H. BOHLMAN
Anterior Cervical Corpectomy in Patients Previously Managed with a Laminectomy: Short-Term Complications
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 1999; 81(7): 950 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text]