This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, K.
Right arrow Articles by Helfet, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, K.
Right arrow Articles by Helfet, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 11 1639-1649, Copyright © 1995 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Magnetic resonance venography to evaluate the deep venous system of the pelvis in patients who have an acetabular fracture

KD Montgomery, HG Potter and DL Helfet
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, N.Y. 10021, USA.

We performed a prospective, blinded study to assess and compare the values of preoperative contrast venography and magnetic resonance venography in the detection of deep venous thrombosis in the thigh and pelvis of forty-five consecutive patients who had a displaced acetabular fracture. The magnetic resonance venography and contrast venography were performed an average of seven days (range, one to twenty-nine days) after the injury. Twenty-four asymptomatic thrombi were identified with magnetic resonance venography in fifteen (33 percent) of the patients. Four of the thrombi were in the superficial femoral vein, nine were in the common femoral vein, one was in the external iliac vein, seven were in the internal iliac vein, and three were in the common iliac vein. Ten (42 percent) of the twenty-four thrombi were confirmed with contrast venography; nine of them were located in the thigh. The remaining fourteen thrombi (58 percent) that had been noted on magnetic resonance venography could not be seen with contrast venography because they were located either in the deep pelvic veins or in the uninjured extremity. The thrombi in the internal iliac vein were identified only with magnetic resonance venography. Twelve of the fifteen patients who had thrombi had a filter placed in the inferior vena cava preoperatively. In eight of these patients, the filter was placed because of the findings of magnetic resonance venography alone. Magnetic resonance venography resulted in a change in the therapeutic management of ten (22 per cent) of the forty-five patients. There were no pulmonary emboli. We concluded that magnetic resonance venography is superior to contrast venography for the preoperative evaluation of proximal deep venous thrombosis in patients who have an acetabular fracture. Magnetic resonance venography is non-invasive, does not require the use of contrast medium, images the proximal aspects of both lower extremities simultaneously, and, most importantly, allows for the identification of deep venous thrombosis in the pelvis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. P. Stannard, R. R. Lopez-Ben, D. A. Volgas, E. R. Anderson, M. Busbee, D. K. Karr, G. R. McGwin Jr., and J. E. Alonso
Prophylaxis Against Deep-Vein Thrombosis Following Trauma: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Mechanical and Pharmacologic Prophylaxis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2006; 88(2): 261 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
N. Steele, R. M. Dodenhoff, A. J. Ward, and M. H. Morse
Thromboprophylaxis in pelvic and acetabular trauma surgery: THE ROLE OF EARLY TREATMENT WITH LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN
J Bone Joint Surg Br, February 1, 2005; 87-B(2): 209 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. G. W. Fraser, A. R. Moody, I. R. Davidson, A. L. Martel, and P. S. Morgan
Deep Venous Thrombosis: Diagnosis by Using Venous Enhanced Subtracted Peak Arterial MR Venography versus Conventional Venography
Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 812 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. G. Ryan, G. H. Westrich, H. G. Potter, N. Sharrock, L. M. Maun, W. Macaulay, P. Katkin, T. P. Sculco, and E. A. Salvati
Effect of Mechanical Compression on the Prevalence of Proximal Deep Venous Thrombosis as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Venography
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 12, 2002; 84(11): 1998 - 2004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
J. Kelly, A. Rudd, R.R. Lewis, and B.J. Hunt
Screening for subclinical deep-vein thrombosis
QJM, October 1, 2001; 94(10): 511 - 519.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. P. Stannard, R. S. Riley, M. D. McClenney, R. R. Lopez-Ben, D. A. Volgas, and J. E. Alonso
Mechanical Prophylaxis Against Deep-Vein Thrombosis After Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2001; 83(7): 1047 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. E. Spritzer, M. A. Arata, and K. S. Freed
Isolated Pelvic Deep Venous Thrombosis: Relative Frequency as Detected with MR Imaging
Radiology, May 1, 2001; 219(2): 521 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Kelly, A. Rudd, R. Lewis, and B. J. Hunt
Venous Thromboembolism After Acute Stroke
Stroke, January 1, 2001; 32(1): 262 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
E. A. SALVATI, V. D. PELLEGRINI, N. E. SHARROCK, P. A. LOTKE, D. W. MURRAY, H. POTTER, and G. H. WESTRICH
Symposium - Recent Advances in Venous Thromboembolic Prophylaxis During and After Total Hip Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2000; 82(2): 252 - 70.
[Full Text]