|
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 11 1639-1649, Copyright © 1995 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc
Magnetic resonance venography to evaluate the deep venous system of the pelvis in patients who have an acetabular fracture
KD Montgomery, HG Potter and DL Helfet
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, N.Y. 10021, USA.
We performed a prospective, blinded study to assess and compare the values
of preoperative contrast venography and magnetic resonance venography in
the detection of deep venous thrombosis in the thigh and pelvis of
forty-five consecutive patients who had a displaced acetabular fracture.
The magnetic resonance venography and contrast venography were performed an
average of seven days (range, one to twenty-nine days) after the injury.
Twenty-four asymptomatic thrombi were identified with magnetic resonance
venography in fifteen (33 percent) of the patients. Four of the thrombi
were in the superficial femoral vein, nine were in the common femoral vein,
one was in the external iliac vein, seven were in the internal iliac vein,
and three were in the common iliac vein. Ten (42 percent) of the
twenty-four thrombi were confirmed with contrast venography; nine of them
were located in the thigh. The remaining fourteen thrombi (58 percent) that
had been noted on magnetic resonance venography could not be seen with
contrast venography because they were located either in the deep pelvic
veins or in the uninjured extremity. The thrombi in the internal iliac vein
were identified only with magnetic resonance venography. Twelve of the
fifteen patients who had thrombi had a filter placed in the inferior vena
cava preoperatively. In eight of these patients, the filter was placed
because of the findings of magnetic resonance venography alone. Magnetic
resonance venography resulted in a change in the therapeutic management of
ten (22 per cent) of the forty-five patients. There were no pulmonary
emboli. We concluded that magnetic resonance venography is superior to
contrast venography for the preoperative evaluation of proximal deep venous
thrombosis in patients who have an acetabular fracture. Magnetic resonance
venography is non-invasive, does not require the use of contrast medium,
images the proximal aspects of both lower extremities simultaneously, and,
most importantly, allows for the identification of deep venous thrombosis
in the pelvis.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Stannard, R. R. Lopez-Ben, D. A. Volgas, E. R. Anderson, M. Busbee, D. K. Karr, G. R. McGwin Jr., and J. E. Alonso
Prophylaxis Against Deep-Vein Thrombosis Following Trauma: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Mechanical and Pharmacologic Prophylaxis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2006;
88(2):
261 - 266.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Steele, R. M. Dodenhoff, A. J. Ward, and M. H. Morse
Thromboprophylaxis in pelvic and acetabular trauma surgery: THE ROLE OF EARLY TREATMENT WITH LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
February 1, 2005;
87-B(2):
209 - 212.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G. W. Fraser, A. R. Moody, I. R. Davidson, A. L. Martel, and P. S. Morgan
Deep Venous Thrombosis: Diagnosis by Using Venous Enhanced Subtracted Peak Arterial MR Venography versus Conventional Venography
Radiology,
March 1, 2003;
226(3):
812 - 820.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. Ryan, G. H. Westrich, H. G. Potter, N. Sharrock, L. M. Maun, W. Macaulay, P. Katkin, T. P. Sculco, and E. A. Salvati
Effect of Mechanical Compression on the Prevalence of Proximal Deep Venous Thrombosis as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Venography
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 12, 2002;
84(11):
1998 - 2004.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kelly, A. Rudd, R.R. Lewis, and B.J. Hunt
Screening for subclinical deep-vein thrombosis
QJM,
October 1, 2001;
94(10):
511 - 519.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Stannard, R. S. Riley, M. D. McClenney, R. R. Lopez-Ben, D. A. Volgas, and J. E. Alonso
Mechanical Prophylaxis Against Deep-Vein Thrombosis After Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2001;
83(7):
1047 - 1051.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Spritzer, M. A. Arata, and K. S. Freed
Isolated Pelvic Deep Venous Thrombosis: Relative Frequency as Detected with MR Imaging
Radiology,
May 1, 2001;
219(2):
521 - 525.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kelly, A. Rudd, R. Lewis, and B. J. Hunt
Venous Thromboembolism After Acute Stroke
Stroke,
January 1, 2001;
32(1):
262 - 267.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. SALVATI, V. D. PELLEGRINI, N. E. SHARROCK, P. A. LOTKE, D. W. MURRAY, H. POTTER, and G. H. WESTRICH
Symposium - Recent Advances in Venous Thromboembolic Prophylaxis During and After Total Hip Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2000;
82(2):
252 - 70.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|