This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davids, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Blackhurst, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davids, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Blackhurst, D. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 10 1490-1497, Copyright © 1995 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Operative treatment of bone overgrowth in children who have an acquired or congenital amputation

JR Davids, LC Meyer and DW Blackhurst
Shriners Hospitals for Crippled Children, Greenville, South Carolina 29605, USA.

Fifty-three children who were less than thirteen years old were followed for a median of seven years and ten months (range, two years and nine months to fourteen years and six months) after operative treatment for overgrowth of the tibia or humerus after amputation. During the thirty-one years in which these children were managed, three operative techniques were used in successive periods. Thus, the fifty-three children could be divided into three groups: thirty-one who had had a resection and revision, nine in whom the bone had been capped with a synthetic device, and thirteen in whom the bone had been capped with an autogenous tricortical bone graft from the iliac crest. A retrospective review was performed to determine the result and complications associated with each of these techniques. Survival analysis revealed that subsequent procedures were performed in twenty-six (84 per cent) of the thirty-one patients who had had a resection and revision, in seven of the nine in whom the bone had been capped with a synthetic device, and in four of the thirteen in whom the bone had been capped with an autogenous bone graft. The estimated mean survival time (that is, the time to a subsequent procedure) was five years in the group that had had the bone capped with an autogenous graft and three years and six months in the group that had had resection and revision; the difference is significant (p = 0.003).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
K. L. Vander Have, R. N. Hensinger, M. Caird, C. Johnston, and F. A. Farley
Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., April 1, 2008; 16(4): 228 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. T. Dedmond and J. R. Davids
Function of Skin Grafts in Children Following Acquired Amputation of the Lower Extremity
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2005; 87(5): 1054 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. G. ARMSTRONG, S. HADI, H. C. NGUYEN, and L. B. HARKLESS
Factors Associated with Bone Regrowth Following Diabetes-Related Partial Amputation of the Foot
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 1999; 81(11): 1561 - 5.
[Abstract] [Full Text]