This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalton, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kay, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dalton, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kay, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 1 97-110, Copyright © 1995 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants

JE Dalton, SD Cook, KA Thomas and JF Kay
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112.

Femoral intramedullary implants were constructed by threading 4.0-millimeter-thick disks with a titanium-alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) porous bead coating onto a two-millimeter-diameter threaded rod. Each porous-coated disk, which was 6.0, 8.0, 9.0, or 10.0 millimeters in diameter, was separated by a two-millimeter-thick acrylic disk with a diameter of ten millimeters. Implants with and without a hydroxyapatite coating of twenty-five micrometers were inserted into fifteen skeletally mature adult mongrel dogs. The femoral canal was sequentially reamed bilaterally to a ten-millimeter diameter, resulting in uniform initial implant-bone interface gaps of 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 millimeters. Each animal received paired hydroxyapatite-coated and uncoated implants. Three animals each were killed at four, eight, twelve, twenty-four, and fifty-two weeks after the implantation. The harvested femora were sectioned through the acrylic spacers, transverse to the long axis, to produce individual push-out test specimens for mechanical testing. Characteristics of interface attachment were determined with test fixtures that supported the surrounding bone to within 150 micrometers of the interface. Histological sections were prepared, and the amount of bone within the porous structure and the amount of the original gap that was filled with new bone were quantified with a computerized video image-analysis system. Mechanical attachment strength and bone ingrowth were found to increase with the time after implantation and with a decrease in the size of the gap. Placement of the implant in proximal (cancellous) compared with distal (cortical) locations had no significant effect on the strength of attachment, bone ingrowth, or gap-filling. However, implants with a large initial gap (1.0 or 2.0 millimeters) demonstrated greater attachment strength in cancellous bone than in cortical bone. With a few exceptions, hydroxyapatite-coated implants with an initial gap of 1.0 millimeter or less demonstrated significantly increased mechanical attachment strength and bone ingrowth at all time-periods. Interface attachment strengths were positively correlated with bone ingrowth, the time after implantation, the use of a hydroxyapatite coating, and decreasing initial gap size. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Initial implant-bone apposition is thought to be a prerequisite for good biological fixation. This apposition is often not achieved because of the design of the implant or instruments and the operative technique. Poor initial fit during the operation may decrease the longevity of the implant. The results of the present study indicate that attachment strength and bone ingrowth are significantly affected by gaps in the interface, particularly those of more than 1.0 millimeter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
D.R. Sumner, T.M. Turner, R.M. Urban, A.S. Virdi, and N. Inoue
Additive Enhancement of Implant Fixation Following Combined Treatment with rhTGF-beta2 and rhBMP-2 in a Canine Model
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2006; 88(4): 806 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Y.-H. Kim, J.-S. Kim, S.-H. Oh, and J.-M. Kim
Comparison of Porous-Coated Titanium Femoral Stems with and without Hydroxyapatite Coating
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2003; 85(9): 1682 - 1688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
R. Illgen II and H. E. Rubash
The Optimal Fixation of the Cementless Acetabular Component in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2002; 10(1): 43 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
W. L. JAFFE and D. F. SCOTT
Current Concepts Review - Total Hip Arthroplasty with Hydroxyapatite-Coated Prostheses
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 1996; 78(12): 1918 - 34.
[Full Text]