This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alman, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Krajbich, J. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alman, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Krajbich, J. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 77, Issue 1 54-64, Copyright © 1995 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Massive allografts in the treatment of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma in children and adolescents

BA Alman, A De Bari and JI Krajbich
Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto.

A retrospective review was performed of the results of all allograft reconstructions that had been done after the resection of an osteosarcoma or an Ewing sarcoma in a skeletally immature patient between 1982 and 1989 at The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto. There were twenty-six patients. Six reconstructions were intercalary, sixteen were resection arthrodeses, three followed resection of a bone segment including the epiphysis (osteoarticular reconstruction), and one was a replacement of the entire humerus. Resection arthrodesis about the knee was performed with a smooth intramedullary rod and with one growth plate left intact. Six procedures were performed in the upper extremity. Excluding the patients who died, the average duration of follow-up was five years and three months. Twenty-one of the twenty-six patients had reached skeletal maturity at the time of follow-up. Eighteen (69 per cent) of the patients had a good or excellent result, four (15 per cent) had a fair result, and four had a failure. Twenty patients (77 per cent) had at least one complication (other than a limb-length discrepancy), and fourteen (54 per cent) sustained at least one fracture of the allograft. Fifteen patients who had had a reconstruction in the lower extremity had survived with survival of the allograft at the time of the latest follow-up. A limb-length discrepancy of at least two centimeters developed in nine of the fifteen patients. Five were managed with a contralateral epiphyseodesis, and one of them had an unsuccessful attempt at limb-lengthening as well. The patients who had a limb-length discrepancy of more than three centimeters at the time of follow-up had been significantly younger (p < 0.05) at the time of the reconstruction than those who had a smaller discrepancy. Three allografts (12 per cent), two of which were implanted early in the series, became infected. Soft-tissue coverage is of paramount importance for the prevention of infection, and we now routinely perform primary muscle (gastrocnemius or latissimus dorsi) transfers when dealing with an inadequate muscle envelope. Twelve patients were followed for more than four years (average, six years and seven months); they had no complications other than increased limb-length discrepancy and one subluxation of the shoulder after the first four years following the reconstruction. Although the rate of complications is higher than in adults, allograft reconstruction remains a useful option for the management of skeletally immature individuals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
H. Futani, T. Minamizaki, Y. Nishimoto, S. Abe, H. Yabe, and T. Ueda
Long-Term Follow-up After Limb Salvage in Skeletally Immature Children with a Primary Malignant Tumor of the Distal End of the Femur
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2006; 88(3): 595 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
L. E. Ramseier, T. I. Malinin, H. T. Temple, W. A. Mnaymneh, and G. U. Exner
Allograft reconstruction for bone sarcoma of the tibia in the growing child
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2006; 88-B(1): 95 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
T. H. Chen, W. M. Chen, and C. K. Huang
Reconstruction after intercalary resection of malignant bone tumours: COMPARISON BETWEEN SEGMENTAL ALLOGRAFT AND EXTRACORPOREALLY-IRRADIATED AUTOGRAFT
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2005; 87-B(5): 704 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
N. Marina, M. Gebhardt, L. Teot, and R. Gorlick
Biology and Therapeutic Advances for Pediatric Osteosarcoma
Oncologist, July 1, 2004; 9(4): 422 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. S. ARROYO, K. L. GARVIN, and J. R. NEFF
Arthrodesis of the Knee with a Modular Titanium Intramedullary Nail
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 1997; 79(1): 26 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text]