This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hennigan, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Clancy, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hennigan, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Clancy, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 76, Issue 9 1322-1327, Copyright © 1994 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The semimembranosus-tibial collateral ligament bursa. Anatomical study and magnetic resonance imaging

SP Hennigan, CD Schneck, M Mesgarzadeh and M Clancy
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Temple University School of Medicine and Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140.

A bursa that was deep to the tibial collateral ligament and adjacent to the semimembranosus tendon was studied in fifty cadaveric knees; a vinyl solution was injected into four of the specimens in order to facilitate a study of the relationship between the bursa and its surrounding structures. The bursa had the shape of an inverted U: the superficial arm was an elliptical pocket that was located between the semimembranosus tendon and the tibial collateral ligament, and the deep arm was a triangular pocket that was located between the semimembranosus tendon and the medial tibial condyle. The bursa measured, on the average, twenty-one millimeters in its greatest anteroposterior dimension and ten millimeters in its greatest superoinferior dimension. Magnetic resonance images were made of two patients, and they showed fluid in the bursa.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. Koulouris and D. Connell
Hamstring Muscle Complex: An Imaging Review
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2005; 25(3): 571 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. De Maeseneer, K. Vanderdood, S. Marcelis, W. Shabana, and M. Osteaux
Sonography of the Medial and Lateral Tendons and Ligaments of the Knee: The Use of Bony Landmarks as an Easy Method for Identification
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1437 - 1444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. F. LaPrade and C. D. Hamilton
The Fibular Collateral Ligament-Biceps Femoris Bursa: An Anatomic Study
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1997; 25(4): 439 - 443.
[Abstract] [PDF]