This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lonstein, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Winter, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lonstein, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Winter, R. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 76, Issue 8 1207-1221, Copyright © 1994 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The Milwaukee brace for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A review of one thousand and twenty patients

JE Lonstein and RB Winter
Fairview Riverside Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

We reviewed the medical records and roentgenograms of 1020 patients who had been managed for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, between January 1954 and December 1979, with a Milwaukee brace; we wished to determine whether use of the brace had effectively altered the natural history of the disease. The findings were considered with respect to a previous study of 727 children who had had comparable curves and had not initially been managed with the brace but had been followed for progression of the curve, during the same time-span as that in the current study. Of those 727 patients, 558 (77 percent) had no progression of the curve. The average age of the 1020 patients at the time that treatment with the brace was begun was thirteen and one-half years (range, ten to seventeen years). None of the patients had received any other treatment, and all had been managed only by the physicians participating in this study. In both the current and the earlier series, the outcome was considered a failure if the curve had increased 5 degrees or more; in the patients in the current study, who were managed with the brace, the outcome was also considered a failure if operative intervention had been needed. Of the 1020 patients in the current series, 229 (22 percent) had operative intervention; this rate was higher in the patients who had a curve of more than 30 degrees at the time of bracing and in those who had a Risser sign of 0 or 1. The 791 remaining patients, who were managed with the brace only, had a mild improvement of 1 to 4 degrees at the time that use of the brace was discontinued (the difference being within the margin of error of measurement). With respect to curves of between 20 and 39 degrees, the rate of failure was lower in the current series of patients who had been managed with the brace than in the earlier series of patients who had not been thus managed but had been followed for progression. Progression of the curve was found to be related to the pattern and magnitude of the curve; the age of the patient at the time of presentation; the Risser sign; and, in girls, the menarchal status. We recommend that immature adolescents who have a curve of more than 25 degrees and a Risser sign of 0 be managed with a brace immediately, rather than after progression has been documented.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. A. Dolan, V. Sabesan, S. L. Weinstein, and K. F. Spratt
Preference Assessment of Recruitment into a Randomized Trial for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2008; 90(12): 2594 - 2605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
B. S. Richards, J. H. Beaty, G. H. Thompson, and R. B. Willis
Estimating the Effectiveness of Screening for Scoliosis
Pediatrics, June 1, 2008; 121(6): 1296 - 1297.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. S. Richards and M. G. Vitale
Screening for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adolescents. An Information Statement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2008; 90(1): 195 - 198.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. O. Sanders
Maturity Indicators in Spinal Deformity
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2007; 89(suppl_1): 14 - 20.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAP Grand RoundsHome page
R. M. Schwend
Obesity Undermines Success of Brace Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
AAP Grand Rounds, November 1, 2005; 14(5): 52 - 52.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. J. O'Neill, L. A. Karol, M. K. Shindle, E. E. Elerson, K. M. Brintzenhofeszoc, D. E. Katz, K. W. Farmer, and P. D. Sponseller
Decreased Orthotic Effectiveness in Overweight Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2005; 87(5): 1069 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. G. Gabos, J. A. Bojescul, J. R. Bowen, K. Keeler, and L. Rich
Long-Term Follow-up of Female Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated with the Wilmington Orthosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2004; 86(9): 1891 - 1899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. B. Winter, J. E. Lonstein, K. J. Noonan, S. L. Weinstein, W. C. Jacobson, and L. A. Dolan
Correspondence
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1997; 79(6): 954-a - 5.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. J. NOONAN, S. L. WEINSTEIN, W. C. JACOBSON, and L. A. DOLAN
Use of the Milwaukee Brace for Progressive Idiopathic Scoliosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 1996; 78(4): 557 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. B. Winter, J. V. Banta, and G. Engler
Screening for Scoliosis
JAMA, January 18, 1995; 273(3): 185 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]