This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Sign up for keyword alerts
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brumback, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brumback, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 76, Issue 8 1162-1166, Copyright © 1994 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

Interobserver agreement in the classification of open fractures of the tibia. The results of a survey of two hundred and forty-five orthopaedic surgeons

RJ Brumback and AL Jones
Orthopaedic Trauma Association, Baltimore, Maryland.

The system of Gustilo and Anderson for the classification of open fractures is commonly used as a basis for treatment decisions and for comparison of the published results of treatment. The reliability of this classification system was tested on the basis of the responses of 245 orthopaedic surgeons to a survey. The respondents were asked to provide data about their age, type of practice, and type of training; the number of open fractures of the tibia that they treated each year; and their use of the Gustilo-Anderson classification system. They were also asked to classify twelve open fractures of the tibia on the basis of a series of videotaped case presentations. Each case presentation on the color videotape included demographic data on the patient, a history of the injury, the results of the physical examination, the appearance and dimensions of the open wound before the operation, preoperative radiographs, and selected portions of the operative debridement with narration. The level of agreement for the classification of each fracture was determined according to the largest percentage of observers who chose a single classification type. The average agreement among the observers for all twelve fractures was 60 percent. The over-all agreement for each fracture ranged from 42 to 94 percent. The average agreement in the subgroup of surgeons who were considered to have the least experience (residents and fellows) was 59 per cent (range, 33 to 94 percent).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. S. Melvin, D. G. Dombroski, J. T. Torbert, S. J. Kovach, J. L. Esterhai, and S. Mehta
Open Tibial Shaft Fractures: I. Evaluation and Initial Wound Management
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2010; 18(1): 10 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
C. G. Zalavras, R. E. Marcus, L. S. Levin, and M. J. Patzakis
Management of open fractures and subsequent complications.
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2007; 89(4): 884 - 895.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 INT J LOW EXTREM WOUNDSHome page
C. C. Breugem and S. D. Strackee
Is There Evidence-Based Guidance for Timing of Soft Tissue Coverage of Grade III B Tibia Fractures?
International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, December 1, 2006; 5(4): 261 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
K. Okike and T. Bhattacharyya
Trends in the Management of Open Fractures. A Critical Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2006; 88(12): 2739 - 2748.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. V. Giannoudis, C. Papakostidis, and C. Roberts
A review of the management of open fractures of the tibia and femur
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2006; 88-B(3): 281 - 289.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
L. Barker, J. Anderson, R. Chesnut, G. Nesbit, T. Tjauw, and R. Hart
Reliability and Reproducibility of Dens Fracture Classification with Use of Plain Radiography and Reformatted Computer-Aided Tomography
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2006; 88(1): 106 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
D. G. Stewart Jr., R. M. Kay, and D. L. Skaggs
Open Fractures in Children. Principles of Evaluation and Management
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2005; 87(12): 2784 - 2798.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
C. G. Zalavras and M. J. Patzakis
Open Fractures: Evaluation and Management
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., May 1, 2003; 11(3): 212 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
A. D. Weitz-Marshall and M. J. Bosse
Timing of Closure of Open Fractures
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2002; 10(6): 379 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
S. A. OLSON
Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Open Fractures of the Tibial Shaft. Current Treatment*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 1996; 78(9): 1428 - 37.
[Full Text]