The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 76, Issue 8 1149-1161, Copyright © 1994 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

Dynamic external fixation of unstable fractures of the distal part of the radius. A prospective, randomized comparison with static external fixation

TG Sommerkamp, M Seeman, J Silliman, A Jones, S Patterson, J Walker, M Semmler, R Browne and M Ezaki
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas-Parkland Memorial Hospital 75219.

A prospective, randomized study was done to compare the results of dynamic external fixation (the Clyburn device) with those of static external fixation (the AO/ASIF device) in the treatment of fifty unstable fractures of the distal part of the radius. Mobilization of the wrist from neutral to 30 degrees of flexion was begun in the dynamic-fixator group at approximately two weeks, and full motion, allowing 30 degrees of extension, was started at approximately four weeks. The external fixation frames in both groups were kept in place for approximately ten weeks. Mobilization of the wrist in the dynamic-fixator group provided little gain in the mean motion of the wrist at the time of the removal of the fixator or at the one, six, or twelve-month evaluation. The static-fixator group had greater flexion of the wrist and radial deviation at the early and late follow-up examinations, while the dynamic-fixator group demonstrated only greater ulnar deviation one month after the fixator had been removed. Motion of the wrist in the dynamic-fixator group resulted in a statistically significant loss of radial length compared with that in the static-fixator group (four millimeters compared with one millimeter, p < 0.001). Complications were more frequent in the dynamic-fixator group. As evaluated with a modification of the scoring system of Gartland and Werley, 92 percent of the results at one year were excellent or good in the static-fixator group and 76 percent, in the dynamic-fixator group. The results of this study cannot support the concept of early mobilization with a dynamic external fixator for the treatment of unstable fractures of the distal part of the radius.
CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. A. Lozano-Calderon, S. Souer, C. Mudgal, J. B. Jupiter, and D. Ring Wrist Mobilization Following Volar Plate Fixation of Fractures of the Distal Part of the Radius J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2008; 90(6): 1297 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Ruch, T. A. Ginn, C. C. Yang, B. P. Smith, J. Rushing, and D. P. Hanel Use of a Distraction Plate for Distal Radial Fractures with Metaphyseal and Diaphyseal Comminution J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2005; 87(5): 945 - 954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. N. YETKINLER, A. L. LADD, R. D. POSER, B. R. CONSTANTZ, and D. CARTER Biomechanical Evaluation of Fixation of Intra-Articular Fractures of the Distal Part of the Radius in Cadavera: Kirschner Wires Compared with Calcium-Phosphate Bone Cement J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 1999; 81(3): 391 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. W. WOLFE, M. D. LORENZE, G. AUSTIN, C. R. SWIGART, and M. M. PANJABI Load-Displacement Behavior in a Distal Radial Fracture Model. The Effect of Simulated Healing on Motion J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 1999; 81(1): 53 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text]