This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Damron, T.
Right arrow Articles by Vanderby, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Damron, T.
Right arrow Articles by Vanderby, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 76, Issue 6 839-847, Copyright © 1994 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

A biomechanical analysis of prophylactic fixation for pathological fractures of the distal third of the humerus

TA Damron, JP Heiner, EM Freund, LA Damron, R McCabe and R Vanderby
Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison 53792-3228.

Twenty-four matched pairs of fresh-frozen humeri from human cadavera were divided randomly into four groups, in order to determine the most biomechanically desirable construct for the prophylactic fixation of impending fractures of the distal third of the humerus. Group I comprised intact humeri and matched humeri in which a 50 per cent lateral, semicylindrical cortical defect of the distal third had been created, resulting in a reproducible model of an impending fracture due to a lytic defect involving 50 per cent cortical disruption at the distal end of the humeral medullary canal. In Group II, such a lateral defect was created in both the right and the left, matched humeri. Group III was composed of humeri in which the defect had been fixed prophylactically with a single plate and the contralateral humeri, which had been treated with double-plating. Group IV comprised specimens in which the defect had been fixed with double-plating as well as those fixed with Rush rods. The fixation of each specimen in Groups III and IV was supplemented with bone cement. Each specimen was tested in torsion to failure, and the resulting peak torque, torsional stiffness, and total energy absorbed were analyzed for each group. The Group-I specimens that had a defect had a significantly lower (p < 0.05) peak torque, torsional stiffness, and total energy absorbed than the intact specimens; all of the specimens with a defect failed at the defect, and all of the intact specimens failed proximally. In Group II, there was a high side-to-side association with respect to peak torque, torsional stiffness, and total energy absorbed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. D. AARON
Current Concepts Review - Treatment of Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pelvis and the Extremities
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1997; 79(6): 917 - 32.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. J. REDMOND, J. S. BIERMANN, and R. B. BLASIER
Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing of Pathological Fractures of the Shaft of the Humerus
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1996; 78(6): 891 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text]