This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clohisy, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mankin, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clohisy, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mankin, H. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 76, Issue 4 549-554, Copyright © 1994 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Osteoarticular allografts for reconstruction after resection of a musculoskeletal tumor in the proximal end of the tibia

DR Clohisy and HJ Mankin
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

An osteoarticular allograft was used to reconstruct a skeletal deficiency in sixteen patients after resection of a tumor in the proximal end of the tibia. The status of each allograft and the condition of each involved limb were evaluated an average of nine years (range, six to fourteen years) postoperatively. The status of the allograft was evaluated according to the survival of the allograft and the occurrence of complications. Of the original sixteen allografts, seven were removed: six, between two and five years after the reconstruction and one, seven years after the reconstruction. A second reconstruction with use of an allograft was performed in five of the seven patients. Fifteen complications occurred in association with eleven of the original sixteen allografts. These included fracture of the allograft (five patients), subchondral collapse (five patients), infection (two patients), non-union (two patients), and instability of the joint (one patient). At the latest follow-up examination, nine patients had retained the original allograft, five had had a second allograft procedure, and two had had an above-the-knee amputation. The most recent result was rated excellent or good in eleven patients and fair or a failure in five, with use of the system of Mankin et al. It was rated good or excellent in nine patients and fair, poor, or a failure in six, and it was not rated in one patient who had died, according to the system of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
L. E. Ramseier, T. I. Malinin, H. T. Temple, W. A. Mnaymneh, and G. U. Exner
Allograft reconstruction for bone sarcoma of the tibia in the growing child
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2006; 88-B(1): 95 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
R. E. Day, S. Megson, and D. Wood
Iontophoresis as a means of delivering antibiotics into allograft bone
J Bone Joint Surg Br, November 1, 2005; 87-B(11): 1568 - 1574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
N. Marina, M. Gebhardt, L. Teot, and R. Gorlick
Biology and Therapeutic Advances for Pediatric Osteosarcoma
Oncologist, July 1, 2004; 9(4): 422 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
H. R. BLACKLEY, J. S. WUNDER, A. M. DAVIS, L. M. WHITE, R. KANDEL, and R. S. BELL
Treatment of Giant-Cell Tumors of Long Bones with Curettage and Bone-Grafting
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1999; 81(6): 811 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text]