This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wattenmaker, I.
Right arrow Articles by Lipson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wattenmaker, I.
Right arrow Articles by Lipson, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 76, Issue 3 360-365, Copyright © 1994 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

Upper-airway obstruction and perioperative management of the airway in patients managed with posterior operations on the cervical spine for rheumatoid arthritis

I Wattenmaker, M Concepcion, P Hibberd and S Lipson
Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

We reviewed the records of 128 patients who had a total of 128 consecutive posterior operations on the cervical spine for problems related to rheumatoid arthritis. Our purpose was to examine perioperative complications related to the airway. The patients were divided into two groups for analysis on the basis of the technique of intubation that had been used. An upper-airway obstruction developed after extubation in eight (14 per cent) of the fifty-eight patients who had been intubated without fiberoptic assistance compared with one (1 per cent) of the seventy patients who had been intubated fiberoptically (p = 0.02). The two groups had similar characteristics with regard to age, sex, severity of the myelopathy, American Rheumatology Association classification, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, cigarette use, duration of the arthritis, use of preoperative traction, use of steroids (both preoperatively and intraoperatively), size of the endotracheal tube, duration of the operation, total duration of the anesthesia, intraoperative fluid balance, and type of immediate immobilization of the neck. The only significant difference between the groups was the time to extubation, which averaged 17.9 hours in the fiberoptic group and 10.6 hours in the non-fiberoptic group (p = 0.02). Logistic regression analysis showed that non-fiberoptic intubation was the significant risk factor, even when allowance was made for the difference in the lengths of time to extubation. We concluded that this life-threatening complication can be minimized with fiberoptic management of the airway.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
D. H. Kim and A. S. Hilibrand
Rheumatoid Arthritis in the Cervical Spine
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2005; 13(7): 463 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]