This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paavolainen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ahovuo, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paavolainen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ahovuo, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 76, Issue 3 335-340, Copyright © 1994 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Ultrasonography and arthrography in the diagnosis of tears of the rotator cuff

P Paavolainen and J Ahovuo
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Helsinki, Finland.

The accuracy of ultrasonography and arthrography in the prediction of lesions of the rotator cuff was evaluated and compared with the operative findings in a retrospective study of forty-nine patients (forty-nine shoulders). In the detection of full-thickness (stage-III) tears of the rotator cuff, ultrasonography had an over-all sensitivity of 74 per cent, a specificity of 95 per cent, an accuracy of 84 per cent, a predictive value of a positive test of 95 per cent, and a predictive value of a negative test of 75 per cent. In contrast, arthrography demonstrated a sensitivity of 93 per cent, a specificity of 95 per cent, an accuracy of 94 per cent, a predictive value of a positive test of 96 per cent, and a predictive value of a negative test of 91 per cent. Ultrasonography could not reliably differentiate between partial (stage-II) and full-thickness (stage-III) tears. Lesions of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon were recorded by ultrasonography for twenty-two patients (45 per cent) and by arthrography for eleven patients (22 per cent). The ultrasonographic finding of fluid in the sheath of this tendon is not a reliable sign of a lesion in the tendon.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. A. Teefey, D. A. Rubin, W. D. Middleton, C. F. Hildebolt, R. A. Leibold, and K. Yamaguchi
Detection and Quantification of Rotator Cuff Tears. Comparison of Ultrasonographic, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Arthroscopic Findings in Seventy-one Consecutive Cases
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 708 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
R. S. Churchill, E. V. Fehringer, T. J. Dubinsky, and F. A. Matsen III
Rotator Cuff Ultrasonography: Diagnostic Capabilities
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2004; 12(1): 6 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Strobel, M. Zanetti, L. Nagy, and J. Hodler
Suspected Rotator Cuff Lesions: Tissue Harmonic Imaging versus Conventional US of the Shoulder
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 243 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. U. BIGLIANI and W. N. LEVINE
Current Concepts Review - Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 1997; 79(12): 1854 - 68.
[Full Text]