This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kang, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bohlman, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kang, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bohlman, H. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 76, Issue 11 1617-1628, Copyright © 1994 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Sagittal measurements of the cervical spine in subaxial fractures and dislocations. An analysis of two hundred and eighty-eight patients with and without neurological deficits

JD Kang, MP Figgie and HH Bohlman
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106.

We analyzed three factors involved in fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine and their relation to the degree of injury of the spinal cord. The three factors were the space available for the spinal cord at the level of the injury, the sagittal diameter of the spinal canal at the uninjured levels, and the Pavlov ratio at the uninjured levels. Of the 288 patients analyzed, eighty-three had a complete injury of the spinal cord, ninety-two had an incomplete injury of the spinal cord, thirty had an isolated nerve-root injury, and eighty-three had no neurological deficit. The mean space available for the spinal cord at the level of the injury was 10.5 millimeters for the patients who had a complete injury of the spinal cord, 13.1 millimeters for those who had an incomplete injury of the spinal cord, 15.9 millimeters for those who had an isolated nerve-root injury, and 16.7 millimeters for those who had no neurological deficit. The difference between the groups was significant (p < 0.001) except for the difference between the patients who had an isolated nerve-root injury and those who had no neurological deficit. The mean sagittal diameter of the canal at the uninjured levels was 16.1 millimeters for the patients who had a complete injury of the spinal cord, 16.1 millimeters for those who had an incomplete injury of the spinal cord, 17.9 millimeters for those who had an isolated nerve-root injury, and 18.1 millimeters for those who had no neurological deficit. The difference between the patients who had a complete injury of the spinal cord and those who had an incomplete injury of the spinal cord and that between the patients who had an isolated nerve-root injury and those who had no neurological deficit were not significant (p > 0.05). However, the patients who had a complete injury of the spinal cord and those who had an incomplete injury of the spinal cord were significantly different from the patients who had an isolated nerve-root injury and those who had no neurological deficit (p < 0.001). The mean Pavlov ratio at the uninjured levels was 0.82 for the patients who had a complete injury of the spinal cord, 0.84 for those who had an incomplete injury of the spinal cord, 0.96 for those who had an isolated nerve-root injury, and 0.96 for those who had no neurological deficit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Miyanji, J. C. Furlan, B. Aarabi, P. M. Arnold, and M. G. Fehlings
Acute Cervical Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: MR Imaging Findings Correlated with Neurologic Outcome--Prospective Study with 100 Consecutive Patients
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 820 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. J. Lee, E. H. Cassinelli, and K. D. Riew
Prevalence of Cervical Spine Stenosis. Anatomic Study in Cadavers
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2007; 89(2): 376 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. Banerjee, M. A. Palumbo, and P. D. Fadale
Catastrophic Cervical Spine Injuries in the Collision Sport Athlete, Part 1: Epidemiology, Functional Anatomy, and Diagnosis
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2004; 32(4): 1077 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. S. Torg, J. T. Guille, and S. Jaffe
Injuries to the Cervical Spine in American Football Players
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2002; 84(1): 112 - 122.
[Full Text]