The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 76, Issue 1 66-76, Copyright © 1994 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc
Distal loss of femoral bone following total knee arthroplasty. Measurement with visual and computer-processing of roentgenograms and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
DD Robertson, CM Mintzer, BN Weissman, FC Ewald, M LeBoff and M Spector
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
The changes in bone-mineral content in the distal aspect of a cadaveric
femur that had been prepared for insertion of the femoral component of a
total condylar knee prosthesis were evaluated with visual inspection and
computer-processing of roentgenograms and with dual-energy x-ray
absorptiometry. Seventeen small slices of bone, each three millimeters
wide, were removed so that, finally, 89 per cent of the bone was lost from
the distal femoral metaphysis. Standardized lateral roentgenograms of the
specimen were made with use of a reference step-wedge of hydroxyapatite,
and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry studies were performed with the x-ray
beam tangential to the interface. The roentgenograms were digitized and the
bone mineral was measured with use of computer analysis. Dual-energy x-ray
absorptiometry was performed with and without the femoral prosthesis in
place, in order to determine the effect of the metallic prosthesis on the
accuracy of the measurement. A bone loss of 25 per cent or more was
identified visually by all five of the readers 100 per cent of the time;
losses of 20 to 24 per cent, 15 to 19 per cent, 10 to 14 per cent, and 3 to
9 per cent were correctly identified 92, 75, 66, and 59 per cent of the
time, respectively. The measurements of bone-mineral content that were
obtained from the digitized roentgenograms were linearly correlated with
the actual bone-mineral content (the ash content) (r = 0.97, p < 0.001)
and were three times more accurate than the visual readings. The
determinations of bone-mineral content with dual-energy x-ray
absorptiometry correlated highly with the ash content (r = 1.00, p <
0.001) and were seven times more accurate than the visual readings. There
was only a 4 per cent difference between the measurements with dual-energy
x-ray absorptiometry made with the prosthesis in place and those made
without it in place (p < 0.01). Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry was the
most accurate of the three methods and could detect the smallest
experimentally created loss; computer-processing and visual-processing of
roentgenograms detected losses of 8 per cent or more and 25 per cent or
more, respectively. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and
computer-processing of the roentgenograms quantified the bone loss, while
visual-processing could detect only the presence or absence of bone
loss.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)