This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKellop, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ebramzadeh, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McKellop, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ebramzadeh, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 75, Issue 7 1019-1025, Copyright © 1993 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Control of motion of tibial fractures with use of a functional brace or an external fixator. A study of cadavera with use of a magnetic motion sensor

H McKellop, R Hoffmann, A Sarmiento and E Ebramzadeh
Orthopaedic Hospital, Los Angeles, California 90007.

A computer-linked magnetic motion transducer was used to monitor and record the six components of motion of the bone fragments in eight cadaveric tibiae in which a simulated, oblique fracture of the middle of the shaft had been stabilized with a functional brace. The limbs were mounted in a servo-hydraulic testing frame, and a cyclic load of 150 newtons was applied along the axis of the tibia. Motion sensors, attached to each side of the fracture, measured and displayed the values of the three translations (axial, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral), the axial rotation, and the two angulations (anterior-posterior and varus-valgus) as they occurred. Although only an axial load was applied, the off-axis motions were comparable in magnitude with the motion along the axis. The elastic (recoverable) translations of the fragments ranged from 0.5 to 1.9 millimeters, about four to ten times larger than the corresponding motions that were recorded in an earlier study of such fractures that had been stabilized with two types of external fixators. The recoverable rotation and angulations of the fragments of the limbs in the functional brace ranged from 0.7 to 1.2 degrees, about ten times those recorded when the external fixators were used.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. F. LaPrade, A. H. Engebretsen, T. V. Ly, S. Johansen, F. A. Wentorf, and L. Engebretsen
The Anatomy of the Medial Part of the Knee
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2007; 89(9): 2000 - 2010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S.-H. PARK, K. O'CONNOR, H. MCKELLOP, and A. SARMIENTO
The Influence of Active Shear or Compressive Motion on Fracture-Healing
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1998; 80(6): 868 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text]