This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arntz, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Matsen, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arntz, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Matsen, F. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 75, Issue 4 485-491, Copyright © 1993 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Prosthetic replacement of the shoulder for the treatment of defects in the rotator cuff and the surface of the glenohumeral joint

CT Arntz, S Jackins and FA Matsen
University of Washington Shoulder and Elbow Service, Seattle.

We operatively treated, between 1978 and 1987, twenty-one shoulders in nineteen patients, fifty-four to eighty-four years old, who had disabling pain attributable to a massive tear of the rotator cuff, accompanied by loss of the surface of the glenohumeral joint. These patients were not candidates for total shoulder replacement because of the massive deficiency in the cuff and the fixed upward displacement of the humeral head. A prerequisite for hemiarthroplasty was a functionally intact coracoacromial arch to provide superior secondary stability for the prosthesis. One important aspect of the operative technique was the selection of a sufficiently small prosthesis so that excessive tightness of the posterior aspect of the capsule could be avoided. Eighteen shoulders in sixteen patients were available for follow-up, which ranged from twenty-five to 122 months. Pain decreased from marked or disabling in fourteen shoulders preoperatively to none or slight in ten and to pain only after unusual activity in four. Active forward elevation improved from an average of 66 degrees preoperatively to an average of 109 degrees postoperatively. One patient, who had had an excellent result, fell and sustained an acromial fracture, so the functional result changed to poor. Three patients had persistent, substantial pain in the shoulder that led to a revision. Neither infection nor prosthetic loosening developed in any shoulder.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. S. Goldberg, J.-E. Bell, H. J. Kim, S. F. Bak, W. N. Levine, and L. U. Bigliani
Hemiarthroplasty for the Rotator Cuff-Deficient Shoulder
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2008; 90(3): 554 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. W. Simovitch, M. A. Zumstein, E. Lohri, N. Helmy, and C. Gerber
Predictors of Scapular Notching in Patients Managed with the Delta III Reverse Total Shoulder Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2007; 89(3): 588 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. Guery, L. Favard, F. Sirveaux, D. Oudet, D. Mole, and G. Walch
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Survivorship Analysis of Eighty Replacements Followed for Five to Ten Years
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2006; 88(8): 1742 - 1747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. Boileau, R. J. Sinnerton, C. Chuinard, and G. Walch
Arthroplasty of the shoulder
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2006; 88-B(5): 562 - 575.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. M. Hettrich, E. Weldon III, R. S. Boorman, I. M. Parsons IV, and F. A. Matsen III
Preoperative Factors Associated with Improvements in Shoulder Function After Humeral Hemiarthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2004; 86(7): 1446 - 1451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
T. B. Edwards, A. Boulahia, J.-F. Kempf, P. Boileau, C. Nemoz, and G. Walch
The Influence of Rotator Cuff Disease on the Results of Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis: Results of a Multicenter Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 9, 2002; 84(12): 2240 - 2248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. Sanchez-Sotelo, R. H. Cofield, and C. M. Rowland
Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty for Glenohumeral Arthritis Associated with Severe Rotator Cuff Deficiency
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2001; 83(12): 1814 - 1822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. W. SPERLING and R. H. COFIELD
Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Glenoid Arthrosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1998; 80(6): 860 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. A. WIRTH and C. A. ROCKWOOD JR.
Current Concepts Review - Complications of Total Shoulder-Replacement Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 1996; 78(4): 603 - 16.
[Full Text]