This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rorabeck, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nott, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rorabeck, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nott, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 75, Issue 3 402-408, Copyright © 1993 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

The Miller-Galante knee prosthesis for the treatment of osteoarthrosis. A comparison of the results of partial fixation with cement and fixation without any cement

CH Rorabeck, RB Bourne, PL Lewis and L Nott
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.

In a prospective, non-randomized study of 344 patients who had 392 primary total knee replacements with a Miller-Galante I prosthesis for the treatment of osteoarthrosis, the results of partial fixation with cement (insertion of the tibial and patellar components with cement and of the femoral component without cement) were compared with those of fixation without any cement. Of the 392 knees, 183 (163 patients) had fixation without cement (Group I) and 209 (181 patients), with and without cement (Group II). The average duration of follow-up was three years (range, two to five years). Nine patients died during the follow-up period, but no others were lost to follow-up. Analysis of the knee scores, range of motion of the knee, radiographs, and rates of complications revealed no differences between the outcomes in the two groups during the follow-up period. The rate of complications due to problems related to the extensor mechanism was high in both groups: a reoperation was performed in fifteen (8 per cent) of the knees that had had fixation without cement and in nineteen (9 per cent) of those that had had both types of fixation. Thirteen patients had additional operative treatment for recurrent patellar dislocations; twelve patients, for abnormal wear of the polyethylene of the patellar component: two patients, for avulsion of the patellar ligament from the tibia; and two patients, for unexplained pain in the knee. In addition, there were eight patellar fractures (two of which led to a reoperation) and three deep infections (all of which led to a reoperation).
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
J.-M. CLOUTIER, P. SABOURET, and A. DEGHRAR
Total Knee Arthroplasty with Retention of Both Cruciate Ligaments. A Nine to Eleven-Year Follow-up Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1999; 81(5): 697 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text]