The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 75, Issue 1 66-76, Copyright © 1993 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

The value of aspiration of the hip joint before revision total hip arthroplasty

RL Barrack and WH Harris
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

The role of aspiration of the hip joint before revision of a total hip arthroplasty remains controversial. To address this issue, we reviewed the results of 270 consecutive hips in which aspiration had been attempted before revision procedures that were performed between 1980 and 1988. All hips had intraoperative findings and clinical follow-up of at least two years to confirm the presence or absence of infection. Only six (2 per cent) of the 270 hips were determined to be infected. Aspiration had been attempted in all six hips, but fluid could be obtained from only four. All six hips also had clinical or radiographic signs, or both, of infection, including increasing pain within three years after the arthroplasty (four hips), inability of the patient to attain pain-free status after the original procedure (four hips), radiographic findings compatible with infection (six hips), and a positive finding on culture of a specimen obtained from a previous aspiration (two hips). Because of these factors, aspiration was attempted a second time in four of the six hips and a third time in three of the four. The four hips from which fluid could be obtained had a total of ten successful aspirations; the cultures of specimens obtained from six of these procedures were positive and those from four were negative. The appearance of the capsular tissue at the time of the operation suggested infection in five of the six infected hips. Histological sections were positive for inflammation in all six: there was acute inflammation only in one, chronic inflammation only in two, and acute and chronic inflammation in three. No organisms were seen on gram stains of specimens from any of the six infected hips. Of the 254 hips that did not have an infection and had been aspirated successfully, thirty-two (13 per cent) had a false-positive result on culture of a specimen of the aspiration fluid. Only two (6 per cent) of the thirty-four hips that had a positive result on culture of fluid from the initial aspiration had a true-positive result. No hip had a true-positive result on culture of fluid that had been aspirated preoperatively without also having clinical and radiographic evidence of infection. On the basis of these findings, we recommend that aspiration be performed in selected patients rather than routinely. It also should be performed only if a detailed clinical history suggests infection or if radiographs demonstrate focal lysis, aggressive non-focal lysis, or periostitis.
CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Facebook    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. F. Schinsky, C. J. Della Valle, S. M. Sporer, and W. G. Paprosky Perioperative Testing for Joint Infection in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2008; 90(9): 1869 - 1875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Birmingham, J. M. Helm, P. A. Manner, and R. S. Tuan Simulated Joint Infection Assessment by Rapid Detection of Live Bacteria with Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2008; 90(3): 602 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. W. Bauer, J. Parvizi, N. Kobayashi, and V. Krebs Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2006; 88(4): 869 - 882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Barrack and R. S. J. Burnett Preoperative Planning for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2005; 87(12): 2800 - 2811. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Duffy, B. A. Masri, D. S. Garbuz, and C. P. Duncan Evaluation of Patients with Pain Following Total Hip Replacement J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2005; 87(11): 2566 - 2575. [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. P.P. Temmerman, P. G.H.M. Raijmakers, E. F.L. David, R. Pijpers, M. A. Molenaar, O. S. Hoekstra, J. Berkhof, R. A. Manoliu, G. J.J. Teule, and I. C. Heyligers A Comparison of Radiographic and Scintigraphic Techniques to Assess Aseptic Loosening of the Acetabular Component in a Total Hip Replacement J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2004; 86(11): 2456 - 2463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. M. Stumpe, H. P. Notzli, M. Zanetti, E. M. Kamel, T. F. Hany, G. W. Gorres, G. K. von Schulthess, and J. Hodler FDG PET for Differentiation of Infection and Aseptic Loosening in Total Hip Replacements: Comparison with Conventional Radiography and Three-Phase Bone Scintigraphy Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 333 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A D Musso, K Mohanty, and R Spencer-Jones Role of frozen section histology in diagnosis of infection during revision arthroplasty Postgrad. Med. J., October 1, 2003; 79(936): 590 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Cyteval, V. Hamm, M. P. Sarrabere, F. M. Lopez, P. Maury, and P. Taourel Painful Infection at the Site of Hip Prosthesis: CT Imaging Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 477 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Tunney, S. Patrick, M. D. Curran, G. Ramage, D. Hanna, J. R. Nixon, S. P. Gorman, R. I. Davis, and N. Anderson Detection of Prosthetic Hip Infection at Revision Arthroplasty by Immunofluorescence Microscopy and PCR Amplification of the Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 1999; 37(10): 3281 - 3290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. SPANGEHL, B. A. MASRI, J. X. O'CONNELL, and C. P. DUNCAN Prospective Analysis of Preoperative and Intraoperative Investigations for the Diagnosis of Infection at the Sites of Two Hundred and Two Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1999; 81(5): 672 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. J. DELLA VALLE, E. BOGNER, P. DESAI, J. H. LONNER, E. ADLER, J. D. ZUCKERMAN, and P. E. DI CESARE Analysis of Frozen Sections of Intraoperative Specimens Obtained at the Time of Reoperation After Hip or Knee Resection Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Infection J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1999; 81(5): 684 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. D. HANSSEN and J. A. RAND Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Evaluation and Treatment of Infection at the Site of a Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty*{{dagger}} J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1998; 80(6): 910 - 22. [Full Text]

				A. E. GROSS, C. P. DUNCAN, D. GARBUZ, and E. M. Z. MOHAMED Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Revision Arthroplasty of the Acetabulum in Association with Loss of Bone Stock*{{dagger}} J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 1998; 80(3): 440 - 51. [Full Text]

				M. J. SPANGEHL, A. S. E. YOUNGER, B. A. MASRI, and C. P. DUNCAN Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Diagnosis of Infection following Total Hip Arthroplasty*{{dagger}} J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1997; 79(10): 1578 - 88. [Full Text]

				J. BERNSTEIN Current Concepts Review - Decision Analysis J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 1997; 79(9): 1404 - 14. [Full Text]

				J. H. LONNER, P. DESAI, P. E. DICESARE, G. STEINER, and J. D. ZUCKERMAN The Reliability of Analysis of Intraoperative Frozen Sections for Identifying Active Infection during Revision Hip or Knee Arthroplasty*{{dagger}} J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1996; 78(10): 1553 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. F. LACHIEWICZ, G. D. ROGERS, and H. C. THOMASON Aspiration of the Hip Joint before Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clinical and Laboratory Factors Influencing Attainment of a Positive Culture J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1996; 78(5): 749 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. W. Bauer Editorial - Identification of Orthopaedic Wear Debris J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 1996; 78(4): 479 - 81. [Full Text]