This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reid, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Aronoff, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reid, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Aronoff, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 74, Issue 9 1392-1402, Copyright © 1992 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The Ellison iliotibial-band transfer for a torn anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. Long-term follow-up

JS Reid, GA Hanks, A Kalenak, S Kottmeier and V Aronoff
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey 17033.

We studied the long-term results of the Ellison technique of extra-articular transfer of the iliotibial band, without advancement of the biceps tendon, as the sole operative treatment for a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Thirty-two patients (thirty-two knees) were evaluated an average of eleven years (range, seven to fifteen years) after the operation. The average age at the time of the operation was twenty-two years (range, sixteen to thirty-four years). Eighteen patients (56 per cent) had a modified Lysholm score of less than 84 points, indicating symptoms during the activities of daily living. Only six patients (19 per cent) had a subjectively normal knee (a modified Lysholm score of more than 94 points). The most common reason for a poor subjective score was the presence of symptoms of instability, in twenty-four patients (75 per cent). Twenty-four patients (75 per cent) had a positive pivot-shift test and twenty-nine patients (91 per cent), a positive Lachman test. Twelve patients (38 per cent) had severe (grade 3 or 4) radiographic changes. The radiographs of the knee appeared normal (grade 0) in only eight patients (25 per cent). There was a significant association between a meniscal injury and radiographic changes (p < 0.05). Fourteen patients (44 per cent) had subsequent procedures due to persistent instability or pathological changes in the articular cartilage or in a meniscus. There was a significant decline in the subjective and objective knee scores in the twenty-one patients who were evaluated at both two and eleven years. The number of patients who had a positive pivot-shift test increased from five (24 per cent) to sixteen (76 per cent). Subjectively, the number of patients who had a good result decreased from fourteen (67 per cent) to five (24 per cent). Objectively, nine patients (43 per cent) had a rating of good at two years; this fell to three (14 per cent) at eleven years. Symptomatic instability, pain, and a positive pivot-shift test were the most common reasons for a poor result. Because of the decline in the subjective and objective scores, we no longer recommend the Ellison procedure as the sole operative treatment for a torn anterior cruciate ligament of the knee.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. D. Beynnon, R. J. Johnson, J. A. Abate, B. C. Fleming, and C. E. Nichols
Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Part I
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2005; 33(10): 1579 - 1602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TraumaHome page
M. Bowditch
Anterior cruciate ligament rupture and management
Trauma, October 1, 2001; 3(4): 249 - 261.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
F. H. Fu, C. H. Bennett, C. B. Ma, J. Menetrey, and C. Lattermann
Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part II. Operative Procedures and Clinical Correlations
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2000; 28(1): 124 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. B. FRANK and D. W. JACKSON
Current Concepts Review - The Science of Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1997; 79(10): 1556 - 76.
[Full Text]