This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moeckel, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Altchek, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moeckel, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Altchek, D. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 74, Issue 6 884-889, Copyright © 1992 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Modular hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal part of the humerus

BH Moeckel, DM Dines, RF Warren and DW Altchek
Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, N.Y. 10021.

A new biomodular prosthesis was used for the treatment of a displaced fracture of the proximal part of the humerus in twenty-two shoulders in twenty-two patients. The fractures were classified according to the Neer system; there were thirteen four-part, five three-part, and four head-splitting fractures. There were fifteen women and seven men, and the mean age was seventy years (range, forty-nine to eighty-seven years). The hemiarthroplasty was performed an average of eleven days (range, one to forty-five days) after the injury. The deltopectoral interval was used in all patients, and the prosthesis was implanted with cement in twenty of the shoulders. All of the patients participated in a supervised program of rehabilitation. The patients were followed for an average of thirty-six months (range, twenty-six to forty-nine months). Twenty of the twenty-two patients had a good or excellent result. The active forward elevation averaged 119 degrees; external rotation, 40 degrees; and internal rotation, to the twelfth thoracic vertebra. All of the patients except for the two who had a poor result had satisfactory relief of pain. The two patients who had a poor result had a successful revision with a modular prosthesis of the same design. The modular head could be removed, enabling the surgeon to gain access to the glenoid and to adjust the soft tissues. The over-all scores correlated inversely with the age of the patients and the interval from the injury to the operation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
B. L. Badman and M. Mighell
Fixed-angle Locked Plating of Two-, Three-, and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., May 1, 2008; 16(5): 294 - 302.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. Levy, M. Frankle, M. Mighell, and D. Pupello
The Use of the Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for the Treatment of Failed Hemiarthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fracture
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2007; 89(2): 292 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. Boileau, R. J. Sinnerton, C. Chuinard, and G. Walch
Arthroplasty of the shoulder
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2006; 88-B(5): 562 - 575.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
M. Loew, S. Heitkemper, D. Parsch, S. Schneider, and M. Rickert
Influence of the design of the prosthesis on the outcome after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in displaced fractures of the head of the humerus
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2006; 88-B(3): 345 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. Plausinis, Y. W. Kwon, and J. D. Zuckerman
Complications Of Humeral Head Replacement for Proximal Humeral Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2005; 87(1): 204 - 213.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. M. Robinson, R. S. Page, R. M.F. Hill, D. L. Sanders, C. M. Court-Brown, and A. E. Wakefield
Primary Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 3, 2003; 85(7): 1215 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
R. J. Naranja Jr and J. P. Iannotti
Displaced Three- and Four-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures: Evaluation and Management
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2000; 8(6): 373 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. W. SPERLING and R. H. COFIELD
Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Glenoid Arthrosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1998; 80(6): 860 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text]