This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Callaghan, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stranne, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Callaghan, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stranne, S. K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 74, Issue 6 839-848, Copyright © 1992 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses. Comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs

JJ Callaghan, CS Fulghum, RR Glisson and SK Stranne
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

We compared the magnitudes of motion between the prosthesis and bone during axial and torsional loading in seven matched pairs of fresh-frozen femora of cadavera in which an uncemented, collarless, isthmus-filling, straight-stem (Harris-Galante) prosthesis had been placed in one femur and an uncemented, collarless, proximal-filling, curved-stem (anatomic) prosthesis had been placed in the other femur. The comparison was performed in order to determine the effect of the geometry of the stem on the magnitude of motion. Single-limb-stance loads and combined axial and torsional loads were applied to the implanted femoral prostheses with the use of a jig that simulated acetabular and trochanteric loading. Extensometers were used to measure motion at the prosthesis-bone interface. The prostheses were then removed and were reinserted, with cement applied to the proximal porous coating to simulate ingrowth of bone. The single-limb-stance and combined axial and torsional loads were reapplied and the magnitude of motion was recorded again. No significant differences in the magnitudes of the motion were found between the femora in which the straight stem had been implanted and the femora in which the curved stem had been implanted, during either simulated single-limb-stance or low-intensity torsional loading. When large torsional moments (twenty-two newton-meters) were applied, significantly less motion occurred at the bone-prosthesis interface, both proximally (p = 0.019) and distally (p = 0.0013), in the femora with the curved-stem implant than in the femora with the straight-stem implant. When cement had been applied proximally, proximal and distal motion between the prosthesis and the femur was decreased during simulated single-limb-stance and during torsional loading in the femora with the straight stem and the femora with the curved stem.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
B. D. MULLIKEN, R. B. BOURNE, C. H. RORABECK, and N. NAYAK
A Tapered Titanium Femoral Stem Inserted without Cement in a Total Hip Arthroplasty. Radiographic Evaluation and Stability
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 1996; 78(8): 1214 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text]