This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burkus, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Denis, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burkus, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Denis, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 74, Issue 5 693-704, Copyright © 1992 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Long-term evaluation of adolescents treated operatively for spondylolisthesis. A comparison of in situ arthrodesis only with in situ arthrodesis and reduction followed by immobilization in a cast

JK Burkus, JE Lonstein, RB Winter and F Denis
Minnesota Spine Center, Minneapolis 55454-1419.

The medical records and radiographs of forty-two adolescents (twenty-three male and nineteen female) who had had a posterolateral spinal arthrodesis for spondylolisthesis between 1950 and 1986 were reviewed to assess the long-term outcome of this form of treatment. The average age of the patients at the time of the operation was fourteen years (range, seven years and nine months to seventeen years and eleven months). The duration of the clinical and radiographic follow-up ranged from two years to twenty-seven years and seven months. All patients had an in situ arthrodesis of the involved vertebrae. Eighteen patients had no additional intervention, and twenty-four patients had reduction and application of a cast. Use of the cast led to a decrease in sagittal translation of more than 5 per cent in eighteen patients and a decrease in lumbosacral kyphosis (the slip angle) of more than 5 degrees in fourteen patients. Of the patients who did not have a cast, eight had an increase in sagittal translation of more than 5 per cent and ten had an increase in lumbosacral kyphosis of more than 5 degrees. There were no neurological problems at the time of the initial operation or after the reduction maneuver. At the most recent clinical follow-up examination, thirty-eight patients had no complaints of low-back pain or any restriction of work-related or recreational activities. Persistent low-back pain and pain in the lower extremities limited the activities of the remaining four patients, two of whom had another operation to alleviate these symptoms.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. S. Hu, C. B. Tribus, M. Diab, and A. J. Ghanayem
Spondylolisthesis and Spondylolysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2008; 90(3): 656 - 671.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
E. V. Cheung, M. J. Herman, R. Cavalier, and P. D. Pizzutillo
Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis in Children and Adolescents: II. Surgical Management
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., August 1, 2006; 14(8): 488 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]