This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruth, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Wilde, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruth, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Wilde, A. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 74, Issue 1 95-100, Copyright © 1992 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Capitellocondylar total elbow replacement. A long-term follow-up study

JT Ruth and AH Wilde
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio.

Fifty-one capitellocondylar elbow replacements were inserted in forty-one patients between 1976 and 1986. Thirty-nine patients had rheumatoid arthritis and two had traumatic osteoarthrosis. The average age of the patients at the time of the operation was fifty-six years (range, twenty-one to seventy-seven years). Thirty-one patients who had thirty-nine retained elbow prostheses had an average length of follow-up of 6.5 years (range, two to thirteen years). Flexion improved an average of 20 degrees; extension, 4 degrees; pronation, 22 degrees; and supination, 36 degrees. Relief of pain was complete in 85 per cent of the thirty-nine elbows, and in 15 per cent there was only mild pain. Noteworthy postoperative complications in the original fifty-one elbows included infection in four elbows (8 per cent), dislocation in three (6 per cent), and ulnar neuropathy in sixteen (31 per cent). Three elbows were revised: one for a humeral fracture, one for recurrent dislocation, and one for aseptic loosening. Aseptic loosening was evident on radiographs of two elbows; one patient was completely asymptomatic, and one had mild pain with deformity. The Souter zonal radiographic assessment system for identification of radiolucencies at the bone-cement interface was utilized; there was no significant difference in radiolucencies between ulnar components backed with metal and those that were not backed with metal. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survivorship analysis demonstrated that a functional prosthesis was retained in 88 per cent of the elbows at 1.4 years postoperatively and in 83 per cent at 5.5 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. L. Shi, D. Zurakowski, D. G. Jones, M. J. Koris, and T. S. Thornhill
Semiconstrained Primary and Revision Total Elbow Arthroplasty with Use of the Coonrad-Morrey Prosthesis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2007; 89(7): 1467 - 1475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
N. Tanaka, H. Sakahashi, S. Ishii, and H. Kudo
Comparison of two types of ulnar component in type-5 Kudo total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2006; 88-B(3): 341 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
C. P. Little, A. J. Graham, and A. J. Carr
Total elbow arthroplasty: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE UNTIL THE END OF 2003
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2005; 87-B(4): 437 - 444.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. I. Kauffman, A. L. Chen, S. Stuchin, and P. E. Di Cesare
Surgical Management of the Rheumatoid Elbow
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2003; 11(2): 100 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
N. Tanaka, H. Kudo, K. Iwano, H. Sakahashi, E. Sato, and S. Ishii
Kudo Total Elbow Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis : A Long-Term Follow-up Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2001; 83(10): 1506 - 1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. M. CONNOR and B. F. MORREY
Total Elbow Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1998; 80(5): 678 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. YAMAGUCHI, R. A. ADAMS, and B. F. MORREY
Infection after Total Elbow Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 1998; 80(4): 481 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. J. W. KING, R. A. ADAMS, and B. F. MORREY
Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Revision with Use of a Non-Custom Semiconstrained Prosthesis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 1997; 79(3): 394 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text]