This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brumback, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brumback, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 74, Issue 1 106-112, Copyright © 1992 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Part III: Long-term effects of static interlocking fixation

RJ Brumback, TS Ellison, A Poka, GH Bathon and AR Burgess
Shock Trauma Center, Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems, Baltimore 21201.

The results of treatment of fractures of the femoral shaft with static interlocking nailing were reviewed retrospectively to determine the clinical importance of any stress-riser or stress-shielding properties of the nail. These properties, if relevant, would have been manifested by refracture of the femur, either through a hole used for a locking screw or through the original site of fracture after extraction of the device. Two hundred and fourteen fractures that had been treated with static interlocking nailing and that had healed without conversion to dynamic intramedullary fixation were divided into two groups. In Group I, which comprised 111 fractures, the static interlocking-fixation device was retained and in Group II, which comprised 103 fractures, the static interlocking-fixation device was removed during one operative procedure at an average of fourteen months after the injury. The average duration of follow-up was thirty months from the time of the original fixation in both groups. All patients in Group II were followed for a minimum of six months after removal of the nail. No femur in Group I, in which the static interlocked nail remained in situ, refractured. No femur in either group fractured through the proximal or the distal holes used for the locking screws. No locking screws or nails broke. One patient (1 per cent) in Group II had a refracture of the femoral shaft through the site of the original fracture six weeks after removal of the nail.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
E. Katsoulis, C. Court-Brown, and P. V. Giannoudis
Incidence and aetiology of anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of the femur and tibia
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2006; 88-B(5): 576 - 580.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
M. L. Busam, R. J. Esther, and W. T. Obremskey
Hardware Removal: Indications and Expectations
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., February 1, 2006; 14(2): 113 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]