This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krettek, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tscherne, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krettek, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tscherne, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 73, Issue 6 893-897, Copyright © 1991 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The role of supplemental lag-screw fixation for open fractures of the tibial shaft treated with external fixation

C Krettek, N Haas and H Tscherne
Trauma Department, Hannover Medical School, Federal Republic of Germany.

Ninety-nine open fractures of the tibial shaft were treated with unilateral external fixation with or without supplemental lag-screw fixation. We compared the results in forty-four fractures in which only external fixation was used (control group) with those in fifty-five fractures that were stabilized with lag-screws and external fixation, and we found no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to the time to full weight-bearing, the time to union, or the rates of delayed union, osteomyelitis, malunion, superficial or deep pin-track infection, or loosening of the pins. The limbs in which the fracture was treated with external fixation and supplemental lag-screws had more than twice the rate of refracture of the control limbs (11 compared with 5 per cent), and the percentage of fractures having supplemental lag-screw fixation that needed bone-grafting to achieve union was more than twice that in the group treated with external fixation alone. We concluded that the routine use of supplemental lag-screw fixation is not indicated in patients who have an open fracture of the tibial shaft that has been stabilized with external fixation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. J. Gardner, M. H. Griffith, D. Demetrakopoulos, R. H. Brophy, A. Grose, D. L. Helfet, and D. G. Lorich
Hybrid Locked Plating of Osteoporotic Fractures of the Humerus
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2006; 88(9): 1962 - 1967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TraumaHome page
R. J. Pacheco and M. Saleh
The role of external fixation in trauma
Trauma, April 1, 2004; 6(2): 143 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]