This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herkowitz, H. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kurz, L. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herkowitz, H. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kurz, L. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 73, Issue 6 802-808, Copyright © 1991 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis

HN Herkowitz and LT Kurz
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.

Fifty patients who had spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were prospectively studied clinically and radiographically to determine if concomitant intertransverse-process arthrodesis provided better results than decompressive laminectomy alone. There were thirty-six women and fourteen men. The mean age of the twenty-five patients who had had an arthrodesis was 63.5 years and that of the twenty-five patients who had not had an arthrodesis, sixty-five years. The level of the operation was between the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae in forty-one patients and between the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae in nine patients. The patients were followed for a mean of three years (range, 2.4 to four years). In the patients who had had a concomitant arthrodesis, the results were significantly better with respect to relief of pain in the back and lower limbs.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
K. Majid and J. S. Fischgrund
Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Trends in Management
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., April 1, 2008; 16(4): 208 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. S. Hu, C. B. Tribus, M. Diab, and A. J. Ghanayem
Spondylolisthesis and Spondylolysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2008; 90(3): 656 - 671.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. N. Katz and M. B. Harris
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
N. Engl. J. Med., February 21, 2008; 358(8): 818 - 825.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. N. Weinstein, J. D. Lurie, T. D. Tosteson, B. Hanscom, A. N.A. Tosteson, E. A. Blood, N. J.O. Birkmeyer, A. S. Hilibrand, H. Herkowitz, F. P. Cammisa, et al.
Surgical versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
N. Engl. J. Med., May 31, 2007; 356(22): 2257 - 2270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. S. Yuan and T. J. Albert
Nonsurgical and Surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2004; 86(10): 2319 - 2330.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. A. Deyo, A. Nachemson, and S. K. Mirza
Spinal-Fusion Surgery -- The Case for Restraint
N. Engl. J. Med., February 12, 2004; 350(7): 722 - 726.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. Sugimoto, Y. Takakura, T. Kumai, M. Iwai, and Y. Tanaka
Reconstruction of the Lateral Ankle Ligaments with Bone-Patellar Tendon Graft in Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability : A Preliminary Report
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2002; 30(3): 340 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. A. Deyo and J. N. Weinstein
Low Back Pain
N. Engl. J. Med., February 1, 2001; 344(5): 363 - 370.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. R. GARFIN, H. N. HERKOWITZ, and S. MIRKOVIC
Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Spinal Stenosis*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 1999; 81(4): 572 - 86.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. M. SPIVAK
Current Concepts Review - Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 1998; 80(7): 1053 - 66.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. Karlsson, B. I. Eriksson, T. Bergsten, O. Rudholm, and L. Sward
Comparison of Two Anatomic Reconstructions for Chronic Lateral instability of the Ankle Joint
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1997; 25(1): 48 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Wilson-MacDonald
Controversies in Management: The case for spinal fusion is unproved
BMJ, January 6, 1996; 312(7022): 39 - 40.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
I. Taga, K. Shino, M. Inoue, K. Nakata, and A. Maeda
Articular cartilage lesions in ankles with lateral ligament injury: An arthroscopic study
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1993; 21(1): 120 - 127.
[Abstract] [PDF]