This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gelberman, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gelberman, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 73, Issue 5 659-666, Copyright © 1991 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. A quantitative analysis of motion, gait, and femoral remodeling after in situ fixation

DB Siegel, JR Kasser, P Sponseller and RH Gelberman
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

A prospective clinical study was done for quantitative examination of motion of the hip, gait, and proximal femoral remodeling after in situ fixation of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis. In situ fixation was performed in forty-five consecutively treated patients (fifty-six hips). Thirty-nine (87 per cent) of the patients returned for examination two years after treatment. The greatest percentage of motion of the hip returned within six months after treatment. Despite loss of internal rotation of the hip, the mean foot-progression angle was 10.8 degrees. Radiography and computerized tomographic scanning revealed minimum change in the relationship of the femoral head to the femoral shaft and no change in the neck-shaft angle. Motion returned despite minimum osseous remodeling. The early return of motion (in the first three months) may have been due to relief of pain, spasm, and synovitis, while soft-tissue stretching and resorption of bone in the anterolateral part of the femoral neck may have accounted for the remainder of the increase in internal rotation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. Ogawa, S. Yamazaki, S. Kobayashi, and H. Ikegami
Correction of Rotational Deformity Following Proximal Humeral Epiphysiolysis in a Newborn. A Case Report with Twenty-Year Follow-Up
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2006; 88(3): 622 - 626.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
W. R. Schultz, J. N. Weinstein, S. L. Weinstein, and B. G. Smith
Prophylactic Pinning of the Contralateral Hip in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis : Evaluation of Long-Term Outcome for the Contralateral Hip with Use of Decision Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 12, 2002; 84(8): 1305 - 1314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]