This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macko, V. W.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macko, V. W.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 73, Issue 3 347-351, Copyright © 1991 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

The joint-contact area of the ankle. The contribution of the posterior malleolus

VW Macko, LS Matthews, P Zwirkoski and SA Goldstein
Biomechanics, Trauma, and Sports Medicine Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.

Eight ankles from fresh cadavera were tested under simulated clinical conditions to determine the effect of increasing the size of the posterior malleolar fracture on the contact area of the ankle joint and on the distribution of joint pressure. The surface area of contact decreased with increased size of the posterior malleolar fragment. However, the documented changes were smaller than expected on the basis of the findings of Ramsey and Hamilton; they reported a 42 per cent reduction in contact area with only a one-millimeter lateral shift of the talus, which clinically would be associated with a similar one-millimeter shift of the distal tibial fragment. In addition, clinical experience has shown a high rate of post-traumatic degenerative arthritis associated with an inadequately reduced one-half-size posterior fragment. There were considerable changes in the load-distribution patterns, with increased confluence and concentration of loads as the size of the fragment was increased. In plantar flexion, many specimens had three separate areas of contact between the tibia and the talus. With increased size of the posterior fragment, the three areas of contact always joined to become one. Similarly, for all positions of the ankle, increased size of the posterior fragment caused decreases in the contact area. The maximum loss of contact area was 35 per cent for specimens with one-half-size fractures that were tested in the neutral position.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
Y. Tochigi, M. J. Rudert, C. L. Saltzman, A. Amendola, and T. D. Brown
Contribution of Articular Surface Geometry to Ankle Stabilization
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2006; 88(12): 2704 - 2713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
N. Haraguchi, H. Haruyama, H. Toga, and F. Kato
Pathoanatomy of Posterior Malleolar Fractures of the Ankle
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2006; 88(5): 1085 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. H. Thomas and T. R. Daniels
Ankle Arthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2003; 85(5): 923 - 936.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. L. Marsh, J. Buckwalter, R. Gelberman, D. Dirschl, S. Olson, T. Brown, and A. Llinias
Articular Fractures: Does an Anatomic Reduction Really Change the Result?
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 9, 2002; 84(7): 1259 - 1271.
[Full Text] [PDF]