This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Granberry, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tullos, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Granberry, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tullos, H. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 73, Issue 10 1453-1459, Copyright © 1991 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Use of a hinged silicone prosthesis for replacement arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint

WM Granberry, PC Noble, JO Bishop and HS Tullos
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

A series of ninety consecutive total joint replacements of the first metatarsophalangeal joint with a flexible hinged prosthesis was reviewed after an average duration of follow-up of three years (range, twenty-four to sixty-one months). Although subjectively the results were satisfactory in most of the patients, and pain, the most common preoperative symptom, was reduced, mechanical failure of the implant was common, as determined radiographically. The frequency of failure of the implant and the extent to which it failed were related to the length of time that the implant had been in place. The range of motion of the metatarsophalangeal joint was decreased from normal. Dorsiflexion averaged 26 degrees and plantar flexion, 18 degrees. Callosities under at least one metatarsophalangeal joint were noted in fifty (69 per cent) of the feet that had a physical examination. Pedobarographic analysis of the distribution of plantar pressure revealed that none of the patients exerted weight-bearing pressures on the affected great toe. However, the subjective results were not significantly associated with radiographic evidence of failure of the implant. Despite its success in relieving the symptoms in our patients, we have abandoned this procedure because of the high and increasing rate of failure of the implant, as demonstrated radiographically.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. S. Taljanovic, M. D. Jones, T. B. Hunter, J. B. Benjamin, J. T. Ruth, A. W. Brown, and J. E. Sheppard
Joint Arthroplasties and Prostheses
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2003; 23(5): 1295 - 1314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. J. SHEREFF and J. F. BAUMHAUER
Current Concepts Review - Hallux Rigidus and Osteoarthrosis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1998; 80(6): 898 - 908.
[Full Text]