This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, J. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 73, Issue 10 1439-1452, Copyright © 1991 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. Histological analysis of components retrieved at autopsy

TW Bauer, RC Geesink, R Zimmerman and JT McMahon
Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195-5138.

Plasma-sprayed coating of hydroxyapatite are biocompatible and, because of their osteoconductive properties, may contribute to the early fixation of total joint prostheses. To evaluate this interface, we histologically analyzed five hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems which, along with the surrounding bone, were retrieved from three humans at autopsy. The five femoral components had been in situ for a mean duration of twelve months (range, almost five to twenty-five months) and had been inserted for osteonecrosis (two), osteoarthrosis (two), and as an uncermented revision for failure of a cemented stem. The three patients had had a good or excellent clinical result and had died of causes unrelated to the joint arthroplasty. A coating of hydroxyapatite was identified on each stem. There was a variable amount of apposition of bone (32 to 78 per cent of available surface per section). The deposition of bone was most prominent on the surface of the prosthesis that was close to the endosteal surface of the bone, especially in areas that are predicted by Wolff's law (anterior and medial aspects of the implant, and at lateral-oblique corners). There were occasional foci of bone-remodeling around the implant, including osteoclast-mediated removal of the coating of hydroxyapatite along with adjacent bone. Occasional particles of ceramic were present within macrophages in the adjacent bone marrow. Other areas showed formation of new bone with a few areas of bone directly against the metal substrate. The over-all histological features suggest mechanically stable implants with bone-remodeling at the surface of the bone-implant interface.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
K. Hayashi, A. Fotovati, S. A. Ali, K. Oda, H. Oida, and M. Naito
Prostaglandin EP4 receptor agonist augments fixation of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in a rat model of osteoporosis
J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2005; 87-B(8): 1150 - 1156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. Dumbleton and M. T. Manley
Hydroxyapatite-Coated Prostheses in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2004; 86(11): 2526 - 2540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Y.-Y. Won, L. D. Dorr, and Z. Wan
Comparison of Proximal Porous-Coated and Grit-Blasted Surfaces of Hydroxyapatite-Coated Stems
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2004; 86(1): 124 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Y.-H. Kim, J.-S. Kim, S.-H. Oh, and J.-M. Kim
Comparison of Porous-Coated Titanium Femoral Stems with and without Hydroxyapatite Coating
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2003; 85(9): 1682 - 1688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Y. Mochida, T. W. Bauer, T. Akisue, and P. R. Brown
Alendronate Does Not Inhibit Early Bone Apposition to Hydroxyapatite-Coated Total Joint Implants : A Preliminary Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2002; 84(2): 226 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. Tonino, C. Oosterbos, A. Rahmy, M. Therin, and C. Doyle
Hydroxyapatite-Coated Acetabular Components : Histological and Histomorphometric Analysis of Six Cups Retrieved at Autopsy Between Three and Seven Years After Successful Implantation
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2001; 83(6): 817 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
W. L. JAFFE and D. F. SCOTT
Current Concepts Review - Total Hip Arthroplasty with Hydroxyapatite-Coated Prostheses
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 1996; 78(12): 1918 - 34.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. H. ROTHMAN, W. J. HOZACK, A. RANAWAT, and L. MORIARTY
Hydroxyapatite-Coated Femoral Stems. A Matched-Pair Analysis of Coated and Uncoated Implants
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 1996; 78(3): 319 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text]