This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 73, Issue 1 115-123, Copyright © 1991 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

JOURNAL CONTENTS

The effect of a stiff spinal implant on the bone-mineral content of the lumbar spine in dogs

KR Smith, TR Hunt, MA Asher, HC Anderson, WL Carson and RG Robinson
Department of Pathology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66103.

The response of canine lumbar vertebral bone to the application of a stiff transpedicular screw-plate implant from the third to the fifth lumbar vertebra, without arthrodesis, was investigated. Five groups of six dogs each were studied: dogs that had not had an operation (control group); dogs that had had a sham operation, with survival periods of three and six months; and dogs that had received an implant, with survival periods of three and six months. The results were the same in specimens from the control group and the group that had had a sham operation. In the groups that had received an implant, dual-photon absorptiometry revealed an insignificant decrease in bone-mineral content at the bypassed fourth lumbar segment (17 per cent at three months and 12 per cent at six months). When the data for the three and six-month intervals were pooled, the mean decrease in bone-mineral content of 14 per cent was significant. Histomorphic study yielded similar results; the mean decrease in bone-mineral content for the pooled three and six-month specimens was significant (16 per cent). Losses were similar for the ventral and dorsal columns. Histomorphometric analysis also showed a significant (13 per cent) loss of bone-mineral content at the adjacent caudad (sixth lumbar) vertebra for the pooled three and six-month groups. The results of the methods of analysis of loss of bone-mineral content correlated strongly. Under these experimental conditions, a stiff spinal implant caused loss of bone-mineral content of the bypassed vertebral segment, although the loss was less than anticipated and did not increase between three and six months.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. KANAYAMA, B. W. CUNNINGHAM, J. C. WEIS, L. M. PARKER, K. KANEDA, and P. C. McAFEE
Maturation of the Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and Its Effect on Load-Sharing of Spinal Instrumentation. An In Vivo Sheep Model
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 1997; 79(11): 1710 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text]