This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maloney, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maloney, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, W. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol 72, Issue 9 1349-1352, Copyright © 1990 by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


JOURNAL CONTENTS

Comparison of a hybrid with an uncemented total hip replacement. A retrospective matched-pair study

WJ Maloney and WH Harris
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

The efficacy of a type of uncemented total hip replacement was compared with that of a hybrid total hip replacement in which an uncemented acetabular and a cemented femoral component were used. Twenty-five patients who had had a hybrid total hip replacement were matched, by age, weight, sex, and diagnosis, with twenty-five patients who had had an uncemented total hip replacement. All of the operations were done by one surgeon, who used the same operative approach and the same regimen of postoperative rehabilitation. All of the patients were followed for at least two years. The mean postoperative hip score was 96 points for the hybrid group and 84 points for the cementless group (p less than 0.02). Twenty-four (96 per cent) of the patients who had a hybrid prosthesis reported no or only slight pain postoperatively. In the uncemented group, of the six patients (24 per cent) who reported mild to severe pain, five had pain in the thigh, a limp occurred more frequently, five femoral components had migrated, and four hips needed reoperation. The results with the hybrid replacement that had a cemented femoral component were superior to those with the uncemented femoral component over the relatively brief period for which these patients were followed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
Y.-H. Kim
Long-term results of the cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2005; 87-B(5): 623 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
B. Unver, V. Karatosun, I. Gunal, and S. Angin
Comparison of two different rehabilitation programmes for thrust plate prosthesis: a randomized controlled study
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2004; 18(1): 84 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Y.-H. Kim, S.-H. Oh, and J.-S Kim
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Second-Generation Cementless Total Hip Prosthesis in Patients Younger Than Fifty Years of Age
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 17, 2003; 85(1): 109 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
T. E. Brown, B. Larson, F. Shen, and J. T. Moskal
Thigh Pain After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2002; 10(6): 385 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. S. Keisu, F. Orozco, P. F. Sharkey, W. J. Hozack, and R. H. Rothman
Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Octogenarians : Two to Eleven-Year Follow-up
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2001; 83(3): 359 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. A. ENGH JR., W. J. CULPEPPER II, and C. A. ENGH
Long-Term Results of Use of the Anatomic Medullary Locking Prosthesis in Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 1997; 79(2): 177 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. D. MULLIKEN, R. B. BOURNE, C. H. RORABECK, and N. NAYAK
A Tapered Titanium Femoral Stem Inserted without Cement in a Total Hip Arthroplasty. Radiographic Evaluation and Stability
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 1996; 78(8): 1214 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. L. WEBER, J. J. CALLAGHAN, D. D. GOETZ, and R. C. JOHNSTON
Revision of a Failed Cemented Total Hip Prosthesis with Insertion of an Acetabular Component without Cement and a Femoral Component with Cement. A Five to Eight-Year Follow-up Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 1996; 78(7): 982 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. T. WOOLSON and D. F. HABER
Primary Total Hip Replacement with Insertion of an Acetabular Component without Cement and a Femoral Component with Cement. Follow-up Study at an Average of Six Years
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1996; 78(5): 698 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text]